public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] New internal function __access_noerrno
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <67e3afd8-d1ea-ef52-dcf4-c8c4372a3410@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fee5a6f-bde3-6f5f-d8ee-5ab6c8771873@gotplt.org>



On 10/11/2016 03:44, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 November 2016 12:30 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>> I can hack at sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/access.c and drop
>> sysdeps/unix/access_noerrno.c.
> 
> Turns out I can't do this because I will be breaking non-Linux
> configurations that use the SYS_ prefix instead of the __NR_ prefix.  I
> also discovered that I hadn't actually tested the code properly on
> aarch64 and it is broken, so I'll resend the patchset.
> 
> Siddhesh

In this branch [1] I have a WIP for this.  First patch basically
consolidates access Linux implementation and it uses the strategy
to check for __NR_access first (and since it on sysdeps/.../linux
it should not worry about __SYS_*).

Second one is the __access_errno implementation.  It basically handles
the 3 cases (hurd, nacl, and Linux) by adding the __access_errno on
access.c.

I think it should a cleaner solution to __access_noerro (less macro
handling and build objects).


[1] https://github.com/zatrazz/glibc/commits/master-access_noerrno

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-10 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-24 14:43 [PATCH v5 0/6] glibc tunables Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] New internal function __access_noerrno Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-08 17:10   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2016-11-08 19:00     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-10  5:47       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-10 12:15         ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2016-11-10 13:05           ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-10 16:07             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] Enhance --enable-tunables to select tunables frontend at build time Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] User manual documentation for tunables Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-24 17:22   ` Joseph Myers
2016-10-26  9:53     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] Initialize tunable list with the GLIBC_TUNABLES environment variable Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-24 15:01   ` Andreas Schwab
2016-10-26  9:48     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] Static inline functions for mallopt helpers Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-26 17:51   ` DJ Delorie
2016-10-27  3:12     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-10-24 14:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] Add framework for tunables Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-03 10:26 ` [PING][PATCH v5 0/6] glibc tunables Siddhesh Poyarekar
2016-11-08  5:37   ` [PING 2][PATCH " Siddhesh Poyarekar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=67e3afd8-d1ea-ef52-dcf4-c8c4372a3410@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).