public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Status and plans for glibc 2.37 release on February 1st 2023
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:23:59 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78d28afe-779b-3661-a234-21cfa2f12f2a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5468f23f-8a0c-3957-fc00-1b4f06f003fc@redhat.com>



On 31/12/22 15:11, Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Community,
> 
> I am volunteering as the release manager for glibc 2.37.
> 
> Starting with glibc 2.38 I would like to offer my time to mentor
> someone who would like to be a release manager for 2.38 (releasing
> August 1st 2023). I will make this offer again after the 2.37
> release.
> 
> Looking at the calendar the plan looks like this:
> 
> - Monday patch review switches to reviewing critical bug list and
>   ABI issues.
>  - Restarts January 9th.
> 
> - January 2-6 is slushy ABI freeze.
>  - No new ABI additions.
>  - ABI corrections should be reviewed, RM approval not required.
>   - Status of _r_debug COPY relocations is something we should look at.
>     https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=13978
>  - Liberal bug fixes.
>   - Status of pthread cond missed wakup is critical for this release.
>     - I will be making specific time to review the current status.
>       https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=13224
>       https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=12876
> 
> - January 9-31st is hard ABI freeze.
>  - Bug fixing.
>  - No ABI changes without RM discussion.
>  - Higher risk bug fixes should be discussed with community.
> 
> - February 1st
>  - glibc 2.37 release.
> 
> Please raise any concerns you have with this plan.
> 

I have added three fixes I would like for 2.37:

  * Fix remaining -Os/-O1 compile issues [BZ #19444] [1]: this is a long
    standing that triggers compiler warnings not enabled on all optimization
    levels.  It would be good if we can build glibc with multiple optimization
    options to check for such issues.

  * elf: Fix GL(dl_phdr) and GL(dl_phnum) for static builds [BZ #29864] [2]: 
    this issue is preventing the bootstrap on some archs, like alpha.

  * Remove --with-default-link option [3]: this prevents the vtable hardening
    when using --with-default-link=yes (and it also simplifies a bit the
    build setup).

I also added the 'Optimize posix_spawn signal setup with clone3' as desirable
feature.  Both the aarch64 and powerpc64 its are done and it leverages newer
kernel features to speed up posix_spawn.

[1] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=15572
[2] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=15662
[3] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=15551
[4] https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=13901

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-03 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-31 18:11 Carlos O'Donell
2023-01-03 14:28 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2023-01-03 15:23 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto [this message]
2023-01-03 18:50   ` Joseph Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78d28afe-779b-3661-a234-21cfa2f12f2a@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).