public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
	libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Status and plans for glibc 2.37 release on February 1st 2023
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 09:28:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2c46645-20b8-2294-bfa5-9e27efee7a43@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5468f23f-8a0c-3957-fc00-1b4f06f003fc@redhat.com>

On 2022-12-31 13:11, Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Looking at the calendar the plan looks like this:
> 
> - Monday patch review switches to reviewing critical bug list and
>    ABI issues.
>   - Restarts January 9th.
> 
> - January 2-6 is slushy ABI freeze.
>   - No new ABI additions.
>   - ABI corrections should be reviewed, RM approval not required.
>    - Status of _r_debug COPY relocations is something we should look at.
>      https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=13978
>   - Liberal bug fixes.
>    - Status of pthread cond missed wakup is critical for this release.
>      - I will be making specific time to review the current status.
>        https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=13224
>        https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=12876
> 
> - January 9-31st is hard ABI freeze.
>   - Bug fixing.
>   - No ABI changes without RM discussion.
>   - Higher risk bug fixes should be discussed with community.
> 
> - February 1st
>   - glibc 2.37 release.

I'd like to have the _FORTIFY_SOURCE documentation[1] included in 2.37. 
I've added it as a blocker in the Release wiki page[2].

Thanks,
Sid

[1] 
https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20221222160403.4151387-1-siddhesh@sourceware.org/
[2] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.37#Release_blockers.3F

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-03 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-31 18:11 Carlos O'Donell
2023-01-03 14:28 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2023-01-03 15:23 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-01-03 18:50   ` Joseph Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2c46645-20b8-2294-bfa5-9e27efee7a43@gotplt.org \
    --to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).