public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
	Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>,
	Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc] nptl_db: different libpthread/ld.so load orders (bug 27744)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 13:33:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78edaf4c-e2f2-8d4e-0950-98ba24367921@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daf02031-c30e-7bf9-c5a8-047c497406b1@palves.net>

On 2021-04-16 1:18 p.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 16/04/21 17:53, Simon Marchi wrote:
> 
>> Do we need / want to fix GDB if this goes in glibc then?  
> 
> I think so.  We may need to discuss more the "needs_setup" hack, but we
> can do that in that thread.

In the new version I add a new inferior flag "in_initial_library_scan".
It's perhaps not ideal but the result is better than what I had in v1.
But yeah let's discuss that in that thread.

> Given that libpthread.so is going away in the future, we should be thinking about
> addressing that as well.  Does your patch fix that as side effect?

No, I think of that as a separate problem.

> 
> If not, GDB should be keying the loading of libthread_db.so on something else.
> Making GDB try to load libthread_db in reaction to processing ld.so instead
> libthread_db.so would fix that, I think.  And, it would fix this ordering problem at
> hand as well.  So if we do that, maybe we don't need the other changes.

Is it possible to have a completely static executable that doesn't use
ld.so but uses pthreads?

I don't think that would work well for the "run" case, where ld-linux
arrives before libpthreads.so (and before libc.so, for when pthreads is
moved to libc.so).  If we try to load libthread_db when ld-linux
appears, the symbols provided by libpthreads (or libc) won't be found.

We would have to key the loading on when both libpthread and ld-linux
are there (or both libc and ld-linux).

Another problem with the current state (but that would be fixed with
Florian's patch I think) is that gdb has this setting "set
auto-solib-add".  If off, GDB won't load the symbols of shared
libraries.  _Except_ if the library if libpthread:

  https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb/solib.c;h=d32b2210005fdd6a5013cfd566620d6afeae9cf6;hb=HEAD#l968

But it means that if auto-solib-add is off, we won't load ld.so's
symbols, and we fall back on the original problem, even if the ordering
is right.  Since Florian's patch makes libthread_db only access symbols
of libpthread.so, I think that avoids this issue as well.

But then when libpthreads is moved into libc, we'll have the problem
that libthread_db simply won't get loaded...

Simon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16 15:56 Florian Weimer
2021-04-16 16:07 ` Simon Marchi
2021-04-16 16:12   ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-16 16:25   ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 16:28     ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-16 16:33       ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 16:43         ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-16 16:47           ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 16:53             ` Simon Marchi
2021-04-16 17:18               ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 17:26                 ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-16 17:33                 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2021-04-16 18:29                   ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-16 18:35                   ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-16 17:28             ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-16 17:43               ` Pedro Alves
2021-04-19  9:06                 ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78edaf4c-e2f2-8d4e-0950-98ba24367921@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).