public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>,
	Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
Cc: 'GNU C Library' <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] Created tunable to force small pages on stack allocation.
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:48:08 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fd2f7b1-73d3-1bc3-cabf-c67d1930cefc@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mt3bda4s.fsf@oracle.com>



On 13/04/23 13:23, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
> 
> Hi Wilco,
> 
> Exactly my remark on the patch. ;)
> 
> I think the tunable is benefitial when we care to allocate hugepages for
> malloc, etc. But still be able to force small pages for stack.
> 
> Imagine a scenario were you create lots of threads. Most threads
> barelly use any stack, however there is one that somehow requires a lot
> of it to do some crazy recursion. :)
> 
> Most likely the heuristic would detect that hugepages would be useful
> based on the stack size requirement, but it would never predict that it
> only brings any benefit to 1% of the threads created.

The problem is not find when hugepages is beneficial, but rather when
using will incur in falling back to default pages.  And re-reading the
THP kernel docs and after some experiment, I am not sure it is really
possible to come up with good heuristics to do so (not without poking
in khugepaged stats).

For instance, if guard size is 0 THP will still backup the thread stack.
However, if you force stack alignment by issuing multiple mmaps; the
khugepaged won't have available VMA and thus won't use THP (using your
example to force the mmap alignment in thread creation).

I think my proposal will end with very limited and complicated 
heuristic (specially because khugepaged have various tunable itself),
I agree that the tunable is a better strategy.

> 
> Regards,
> Cupertino
> 
> 
> 
> Wilco Dijkstra writes:
> 
>> Hi Adhemerval,
>>
>> I agree doing this automatically sounds like a better solution.
>> However:
>>
>> +static __always_inline int
>> +advise_thp (void *mem, size_t size, size_t guardsize)
>> +{
>> +  enum malloc_thp_mode_t thpmode = __malloc_thp_mode ();
>> +  if (thpmode != malloc_thp_mode_always)
>> +    return 0;
>> +
>> +  unsigned long int thpsize = __malloc_default_thp_pagesize ();
>> +  if ((uintptr_t) mem % thpsize != 0
>> +      || size % thpsize != 0
>> +      || (size - guardsize) % thpsize != 0)
>> +    return 0;
>>
>> Isn't the last part always true currently given the guard page size is based on
>> the standard page size? IIRC the issue was the mmap succeeds but the guard
>> page is taken from the original mmap which then causes the decomposition.
>>
>> So you'd need something like:
>>
>> || guardsize % thpsize == 0)
>>
>> Ie. we return without the madvise if the size and alignment is wrong for a huge
>> page or it is correct and the guardsize is a multiple of a huge page (in which
>> case it shouldn't decompose).
>>
>> +  return __madvise (mem, size, MADV_NOHUGEPAGE);
>> +}
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wilco

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-13 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-13 15:43 Wilco Dijkstra
2023-04-13 16:23 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-13 17:48   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto [this message]
2023-04-14 11:28     ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-14 13:24       ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-04-14 14:49         ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-14 15:32           ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-04-14 16:03             ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-04-14 16:35               ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-14 23:10                 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2023-04-14 16:27             ` Cupertino Miranda
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-28 15:22 [PATCH v5 0/1] *** " Cupertino Miranda
2023-03-28 15:22 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-11 19:56   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-04-12  8:53     ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-12 14:10       ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-04-13 16:13         ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-14 11:41       ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-04-14 12:27         ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-14 13:06           ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-04-14 14:33             ` Cupertino Miranda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7fd2f7b1-73d3-1bc3-cabf-c67d1930cefc@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
    --cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).