Re: [Action Required] glibc decision to use CTI services.

[Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>]

* Alexandre Oliva via Libc-alpha:

> Even then, this would IMHO be a move for GNU to decide, or at the very
> least be consulted on, according to its own values and priorities,
> something that all mantainers appointed by GNU, myself included,
> committed ourselves to observe, prioritize and uphold as maintainers of
> GNU packages.  I encourage other maintainers to justify their responses
> based on GNU's values and priorities, as they understand them.

I'm not sure why “GNU” should have a say in this (whatever this is, you
do not quote enough context).  How would that even work?  I think we
don't have consensus what GNU's current decision-making structure looks
like.

I'm also puzzled why this was sent to the glibc stewards.  The main task
of this group these days seems to be to forward submissions to the
stewards to libc-alpha.  That doesn't seem to be very useful.

Thanks,
Florian