public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] login: Use unsigned 32-bit types for seconds-since-epoch
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 07:09:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87jzld7lz8.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6289d40a-7989-4869-8f47-553263e4df7a@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:20:07 -0700")

* Paul Eggert:

> On 4/3/24 11:39, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> For consistency,
>> if there is a 64-bit architecture that is coinstallable, define
>> __WORDSIZE_TIME64_COMPAT32 to 1 on the 32-bit architectyre as well.
>
> Could you explain the advantage of consistency here? User code almost
> invariably assignes ut_tv.tv_sec to time_t (this is true of every
> instance I found of ut_tv in Gnulib source code, for example). So
> changing this field's type on platforms where time_t is 32 bits will
> likely be ineffective in practice, and might cause more problems than
> it cures.

Few applications with a 32-bit time_t will work once there is a value in
this field with the MSB set.  So the relevant case is applications that
were built with -D_TIME_BITS=64, and there the consistent behavior with
the 64-bit architecture helps.

> Since the _TIME_BITS==32 world is going away anyway by 2038, it might
> be better to leave the field types unchanged in that world, to lessen
> compatibility glitches before that world gives up its ghost.

This is an on-disk format that doesn't change with -D_TIME_BITS=64.

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-04  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03 18:39 Florian Weimer
2024-04-03 21:20 ` Paul Eggert
2024-04-04  5:09   ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2024-04-05 12:46     ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2024-04-05 12:52       ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-05 13:32         ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2024-04-08 12:19           ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87jzld7lz8.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).