From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Consolidate stdio-lock.h
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:44:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o80mcqng.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e02ccf0b-23f3-e1a8-4381-af83e33c812e@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella's message of "Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:35:18 -0300")
* Adhemerval Zanella:
> You are right. The change now uses __libc_cleanup_region_start from
> libc-lock.h instead of the cleanup version. I am not sure about
> hardening, but afaiu __libc_cleanup_push_defer should handle C++
> unwinding for fopencookie.
No, C++ unwinding will right go through these frames. We only
interleave in the other direction (pthread_cancel unwinding running C++
destructors).
> It seems that the Hurd version is indeed to the best option, so I think for
> generic it would be better to just use:
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/generic/stdio-lock.h b/sysdeps/generic/stdio-lock.h
> index 14cf458bdd..a42131f5a5 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/generic/stdio-lock.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/generic/stdio-lock.h
> @@ -45,20 +45,12 @@ __libc_lock_define_recursive (typedef, _IO_lock_t)
> #define _IO_cleanup_region_end(_doit) \
> __libc_cleanup_region_end (_doit)
>
> -#if defined _LIBC && IS_IN (libc)
> -
> -# ifdef __EXCEPTIONS
> -# define _IO_acquire_lock(_fp) \
> +#define _IO_acquire_lock(_fp) \
> do { \
> FILE *_IO_acquire_lock_file \
> __attribute__((cleanup (_IO_acquire_lock_fct))) \
> = (_fp); \
> _IO_flockfile (_IO_acquire_lock_file);
> -# else
> -# define _IO_acquire_lock(_fp) _IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled
> -# endif
> -# define _IO_release_lock(_fp) ; } while (0)
> -
> -#endif
> +#define _IO_release_lock(_fp) ; } while (0)
>
> #endif /* stdio-lock.h */
I suppose so.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-27 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-26 19:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] Move libio lock single-thread optimization to generic libc-lock Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] libio: Assume _IO_MTSAFE_IO Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 12:34 ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 18:40 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 19:35 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Consolidate stdio-lock.h Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 13:25 ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 16:15 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 18:00 ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 18:35 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 18:44 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-04-27 18:49 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Move libio lock single-thread optimization to generic libc-lock (BZ #27842) Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 13:30 ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 16:32 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-28 16:39 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-28 16:56 ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-28 17:14 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Assume _LIBC and libc module for libc-lock.h Adhemerval Zanella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o80mcqng.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).