public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] libio: Assume _IO_MTSAFE_IO
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 14:34:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wnfahfhb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220426191523.833171-2-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> (Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha's message of "Tue, 26 Apr 2022 16:15:20 -0300")

* Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha:

> It is already set by default on all supported architectures and it is
> an expectation that stdio works on multi-threaded environments.

So … this cleanup has got stuck in the past because it's actually more
than just a cleanup.  We actually build most of glibc without libio
locking.  Looks like misc/ nss/ posix/ have not been covered before.

Maybe we should just file a bug for the missing locking and fix this
with this commit?

> index 5af476c48b..c186375c31 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/nptl/libc-lock.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/nptl/libc-lock.h
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
>  
>  
>  /* Mutex type.  */
> -#if defined _LIBC || defined _IO_MTSAFE_IO
> +#if defined _LIBC
>  # if (!IS_IN (libc) && !IS_IN (libpthread)) || !defined _LIBC
>  typedef struct { pthread_mutex_t mutex; } __libc_lock_recursive_t;
>  # else

This doesn't look quite right.  Would we want to compile this
unconditionally now?

There's also some weirdness I can't explain.  I get strange before/after
symbol differences:

DIFF eu-readelf -s after strip: nptl/pthread_rwlock_unlock.os
--- /tmp/Left-ltjeu50v.o        2022-04-27 14:29:39.070599437 +0200
+++ /tmp/Right-jee20kfm.o       2022-04-27 14:29:39.074599395 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 
-Symbol table [11] '.symtab' contains 14 entries:
+Symbol table [11] '.symtab' contains 13 entries:
  4 local symbols  String table: [12] '.strtab'
   Num:            Value   Size Type    Bind   Vis          Ndx Name
     0: 0000000000000000      0 NOTYPE  LOCAL  DEFAULT    UNDEF 
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@
     7: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 ___pthread_rwlock_unlo>
     8: 0000000000000000      0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT    UNDEF __GI___libc_fatal
     9: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 __GI___pthread_rwlock_>
-   10: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 __pthread_rwlock_unlock
-   11: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 __pthread_rwlock_unloc>
-   12: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 pthread_rwlock_unlock@>
-   13: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 pthread_rwlock_unlock@>
+   10: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 __pthread_rwlock_unloc>
+   11: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 pthread_rwlock_unlock@>
+   12: 0000000000000000    463 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT        1 pthread_rwlock_unlock@>

Can you reproduce this?

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-27 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-26 19:15 [PATCH v2 0/4] Move libio lock single-thread optimization to generic libc-lock Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] libio: Assume _IO_MTSAFE_IO Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 12:34   ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-04-27 18:40     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 19:35       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Consolidate stdio-lock.h Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 13:25   ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 16:15     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 18:00       ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 18:35         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 18:44           ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 18:49             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Move libio lock single-thread optimization to generic libc-lock (BZ #27842) Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-27 13:30   ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-27 16:32     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-28 16:39       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-28 16:56         ` Florian Weimer
2022-04-28 17:14           ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-04-26 19:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Assume _LIBC and libc module for libc-lock.h Adhemerval Zanella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wnfahfhb.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).