From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libio: Update number of written bytes in dprintf implementation
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 22:22:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pmaue6vz.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9eec4720-3c51-64ef-657f-66b6c81e862b@redhat.com> (Carlos O'Donell's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:07:26 -0500")
* Carlos O'Donell:
> On 1/31/23 04:38, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> The __printf_buffer_flush_dprintf function needs to record that
>> the buffer has been written before reusing it. Without this
>> accounting, dprintf always returns zero.
>>
>> Fixes commit 8ece45e4f586abd212d1c02d74d38ef681a45600
>> ("libio: Convert __vdprintf_internal to buffers.
>
> Tested that regression test catches the error without the patch applied.
>
> Tested that the fix corrects the error and correctly adjusts written with
> the number of bytes that were just written in the lines before in the flush.
> For dprintf we must flush everything since there is no buffer. The code
> added looks correct to me and mirrors __wprintf_buffer_flush_to_file (which
> adjusts written by count), __printf_buffer_flush_to_file (which always accounts
> for the bytes), __printf_buffer_flush_obstack (always counted object out bytes),
> and __printf_buffer_flush_snprintf (again always counted).
>
> Tested without regression on x86_64 and i686.
>
> OK for 2.37, pelase commit ASAP since I consider this a release blocker bug
> fix since it was reported by downstream testing in Fedora as part of the
> Fedora 38 Alpha testing (using latest glibc development).
>
> Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
Thanks, pushed.
Florian
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 9:38 Florian Weimer
2023-01-31 9:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2023-01-31 10:35 ` Florian Weimer
2023-01-31 21:07 ` Carlos O'Donell
2023-01-31 21:22 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pmaue6vz.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).