public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	 "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.35 failures in elf/tst-cpu-features-cpuinfo-static.
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:13:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tue6p4n6.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOocJ+WKTMNZV738Rk5bSk5XgoRY31fCv9DWUte_NnfD2A@mail.gmail.com> (H. J. Lu's message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:05:22 -0800")

* H. J. Lu:

> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:00 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> * Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha:
>>
>> > Checking HAS_CPU_FEATURE (RTM):
>> >   HAS_CPU_FEATURE (RTM): 1
>> >   cpuinfo (rtm): 0
>> >  *** failure ***
>>
>> Could you pin this test to specific CPUs and see if it behaves
>> differently depending on the CPU?
>>
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I  believe you ran into:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28033
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000059422/processors.html
>
> Specifically your CPU is listed as
>
> 06_9EH <=0xC 8th/9th Generation Intel® Core™ Processors and Intel®
> Pentium® Processors based on Coffee Lake microarchitecture
>
> I think we should black list all CPUs on the list.

I think Siddhesh ran into this before, after laptop suspend.  It's a
firmware or kernel bug that the CPUID state across cores is inconsistent
after suspend.  It's not a glibc issue.

Thanks,
Florian


  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-14 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-14 16:43 Carlos O'Donell
2022-01-14 17:00 ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-14 18:05   ` H.J. Lu
2022-01-14 18:13     ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-01-14 21:09       ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-01-14 21:11         ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-14 22:10           ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-01-14 22:23             ` Florian Weimer
2022-01-14 22:30               ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87tue6p4n6.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).