Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] elf,nptl: Add -z lazy to some more tests

[Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>]

* Arsen Arsenović:

> Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> * Arsen Arsenović:
>>
>>> Yes, I never signed the copyright papers for the libc.
>>>
>>> I intended to undergo that process, which is why I didn't add signoffs
>>> initially (since they'd indicate that I don't intend to sign over
>>> copyright when I do), so I figured I should wait for advice.
>>>
>>> How should I proceed?
>>
>> It's up to you.  You can try the FSF paperwork process, it should be
>> fully digital nowadays.  And we can apply the patch as a regular FSF
>> contribution once the paperwork is complete.
>
> My previous experiences were rather prompt (usually done by the time I'm
> done with a patchset - not the case here due to the triviality, of
> course).  Is
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/plain/doc/Copyright/request-assign.future
> the right form?  This is the one I've used for gcc et al, to cover
> current and future changes of any nature.

<https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CopyrightFSF> also links to this
form, so I think it's the right one.

Thanks,
Florian