Re: [RFC 0/1] Contributing a compound object to the libpthread

[Oleh Derevenko <oleh.derevenko@gmail.com>]

 Gentlemen,

Thank you for all your suggestions and explanations.
Generally, I understand what you say and I basically knew that. You
explain the standard approach and why it has happened that it is here.
Alas, as I already initially mentioned, for me accepting the standard
approach would be simply resigning everything and staying with fame
only.
Well, I don't have fame either yet.
Now I don't even know why could I think such a huge machine would
adapt for a single person. I wanted to be with the library, but not a
part of the library.
I understand this might look like a parasitic approach, but still... I
supposed there would be something I would be giving back to the
library as well.

I guess, I'll be thinking towards what Adhemerval Zanella and Zack
Weinberg suggested: distributing own library. Thank you, gentlemen,
for that — it might be really a thing I needed to be doing anyway, an
unavoidable step.
May I come here with an announcement when it will be ready?




On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 10:55 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
> Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
>> And specifically, what I think is the current assignment
>> (/gd/gnuorg/copyright/assign.future on fencepost) says:
>
> Heh, I was trying to avoid scaring anyone off with *actual* legalese,
> but yeah, there are details which IMHO are best left to a lawyer.  If
> Oleh has a patent, he probably has a lawyer too.



-- 
Oleh Derevenko

-- Skype with underscore