Re: [RFC 0/1] Contributing a compound object to the libpthread

[Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>]

As Ben Hutchings has noted, new code additions are expected to have be
licensed with LGPL 2.1+ following the default FSF copyright assignment
(as Carlos has noted in previously message). You seemed to not be in 
accord on such criteria, so I think we won't be able to take your 
contribution.


On 16/06/2018 15:37, Oleh Derevenko wrote:
>  Hi Florian,
> 
> Would not it work if a warning and a license text would be put in the
> header and in respective manual pages to declare and explain what are
> the use conditions/restrictions? That would be a kind of offer the
> public could accept and it would provide them legal grounds. Of
> course, I will have little (if any) means to verify and control. But
> this is more a honesty oriented approach and I guess I'll be fine with
> that.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 06/15/2018 04:05 PM, Oleh Derevenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Could it be that a project like libc does not have a group of people
>>> eligible for making decisive judgements and saying "yes" or "no" on
>>> behalf of it? Or do you need more time?
>>
>>
>> You said you want to avoid “misuse within commercial so[f]tware”.  I don't
>> see how you can do that while still contributing to glibc, so I didn't look
>> at your proposal in detail.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Florian
> 
> 
>