public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wang, Yanzhang" <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"libc-alpha@sourceware.org" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RISC-V: Enable static-pie.
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 03:17:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <IA1PR11MB6466ABCE175A21F5CB8ABFACF2ECA@IA1PR11MB6466.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26bd6001-6ff5-dcab-d233-9adb6b8efb6f@linaro.org>

I took some time to test the master with binfmt_misc and qemu system mode.
Both of them can't match the requirements (<= 6 failures).

- most of cases with binfmt_misc fail with abort.
- most of cases with qemu system fail with timed out.

And also tested with my risc-v board and still fails 70+ cases and most of
them are math accuracy issue.

So Adhemerval, do you know how to setup the environment to reproduce
the <= 6 failures ? Maybe I lost some important steps. Thanks very much :).

Thanks,
Yanzhang

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2023 7:46 PM
> To: Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>; Palmer Dabbelt
> <palmer@dabbelt.com>; libc-alpha@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Enable static-pie.
> 
> 
> 
> On 13/08/23 09:20, Wang, Yanzhang via Libc-alpha wrote:
> > Hi Palmer,
> >
> > I have tested the commit(542b110585) with this patch. The results like
> > below,
> >
> > Summary of test results:
> >     189 FAIL
> >    4328 PASS
> >     101 UNSUPPORTED
> >      16 XFAIL
> >       2 XPASS
> >
> > And the commit(542b110585)'s results like below,
> >
> > Summary of test results:
> >     189 FAIL
> >    4326 PASS
> >     101 UNSUPPORTED
> >      16 XFAIL
> >       2 XPASS
> >
> > The binutils's commit is 2db20b97f1d and gcc's commit is bf36656a14a.
> >
> > I use the command make check-glibc-linux in riscv-gnu-toolchain. Not
> > sure is that acceptable.
> 
> The riscv reports for 2.38 release [1] list at maximum of 6 FAIL for all
> the ABI variants.  The 189 failures you are reporting means that your
> environment is either missing some setup (for instance, copying the
> libgcc_s.so and libstd++.so on the build folder so C++ and tests that
> require pthread_cancel or backtrace works correctly) or it is not
> properly configured.
> 
> Please sort this out first, since with that amount of failures is not
> straightforward to check whether static-pie is really working as intended.


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-09  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-10 23:33 yanzhang.wang
2023-08-11  1:57 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-08-13 12:20   ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-08-15 11:46     ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-09-09  3:17       ` Wang, Yanzhang [this message]
2023-09-09  3:30         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-09-09  6:54           ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-09-11 14:14             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-09-11 13:34           ` Darius Rad
2023-09-11 17:28             ` DJ Delorie
2023-09-11 16:17           ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-09-20 13:36             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-09-21 13:47               ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-10-17  8:28                 ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-10-17 13:42                 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-10-24  5:59                   ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-10-24 11:39                     ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-10-26  3:30                       ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-08-14 13:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
2023-08-15  1:48   ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-08-15  1:44 ` [PATCH v2] " yanzhang.wang
2023-12-17 13:16   ` Wang, Yanzhang
2023-12-19 17:44   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2024-01-02 11:02     ` Wang, Yanzhang
2024-01-02 10:54 ` [PATCH v3] " yanzhang.wang
2024-01-02 18:30   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2024-01-17 12:23   ` Andreas Schwab
2024-01-29 12:46   ` Andreas Schwab
2024-02-01 12:39     ` Wang, Yanzhang
2024-02-01 12:53       ` Andreas Schwab
2024-05-21 11:13   ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=IA1PR11MB6466ABCE175A21F5CB8ABFACF2ECA@IA1PR11MB6466.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yanzhang.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).