* [PATCH] nptl: x86_64: Use stackinfo.h definition for CURRENT_STACK_FRAME
@ 2022-08-29 19:00 Adhemerval Zanella
2022-08-29 19:24 ` Noah Goldstein
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adhemerval Zanella @ 2022-08-29 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha
It avoids the possible warning of uninitialized 'frame' variable when
building with clang:
../sysdeps/nptl/jmp-unwind.c:27:42: error: variable 'frame' is
uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
__pthread_cleanup_upto (env->__jmpbuf, CURRENT_STACK_FRAME);
It increases the generated code by one instruction:
--- master
+++ patch
@@ -25068,11 +25068,11 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
3db1b: 00 00
3db1d: 48 89 44 24 08 mov %rax,0x8(%rsp)
3db22: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
- 3db24: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
- 3db29: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax
- 3db30: 00 00
- 3db32: 75 0c jne 3db40
<_longjmp_unwind+0x30>
- 3db34: 48 89 e6 mov %rsp,%rsi
+ 3db24: 48 89 e6 mov %rsp,%rsi
+ 3db27: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
+ 3db2c: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax
+ 3db33: 00 00
+ 3db35: 75 09 jne 3db40
<_longjmp_unwind+0x30>
3db37: 48 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%rsp
3db3b: e9 60 31 05 00 jmp 90ca0
<__GI___pthread_cleanup_upto>
3db40: e8 4b ec 0e 00 call 12c790 <__stack_chk_fail>
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
---
sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h b/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
index 63fdbcb27c..3ff95efee6 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
+++ b/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#ifdef __x86_64__
/* The frame pointer is not usable. */
# define CURRENT_STACK_FRAME \
- ({ register char *frame __asm__("rsp"); frame; })
+ ({ void *p__; asm volatile ("mov %%" RSP_REG ", %0" : "=r" (p__)); p__; })
#else
# define CURRENT_STACK_FRAME __builtin_frame_address (0)
#endif
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nptl: x86_64: Use stackinfo.h definition for CURRENT_STACK_FRAME
2022-08-29 19:00 [PATCH] nptl: x86_64: Use stackinfo.h definition for CURRENT_STACK_FRAME Adhemerval Zanella
@ 2022-08-29 19:24 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-08-29 20:20 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Noah Goldstein @ 2022-08-29 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Adhemerval Zanella; +Cc: GNU C Library
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:00 PM Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
<libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> It avoids the possible warning of uninitialized 'frame' variable when
> building with clang:
>
> ../sysdeps/nptl/jmp-unwind.c:27:42: error: variable 'frame' is
> uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
> __pthread_cleanup_upto (env->__jmpbuf, CURRENT_STACK_FRAME);
>
> It increases the generated code by one instruction:
>
> --- master
> +++ patch
> @@ -25068,11 +25068,11 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
> 3db1b: 00 00
> 3db1d: 48 89 44 24 08 mov %rax,0x8(%rsp)
> 3db22: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
> - 3db24: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
> - 3db29: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax
> - 3db30: 00 00
> - 3db32: 75 0c jne 3db40
> <_longjmp_unwind+0x30>
> - 3db34: 48 89 e6 mov %rsp,%rsi
> + 3db24: 48 89 e6 mov %rsp,%rsi
> + 3db27: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
> + 3db2c: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax
> + 3db33: 00 00
> + 3db35: 75 09 jne 3db40
> <_longjmp_unwind+0x30>
> 3db37: 48 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%rsp
> 3db3b: e9 60 31 05 00 jmp 90ca0
> <__GI___pthread_cleanup_upto>
> 3db40: e8 4b ec 0e 00 call 12c790 <__stack_chk_fail>
>
> Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
> ---
> sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h b/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
> index 63fdbcb27c..3ff95efee6 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
> +++ b/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> #ifdef __x86_64__
> /* The frame pointer is not usable. */
> # define CURRENT_STACK_FRAME \
> - ({ register char *frame __asm__("rsp"); frame; })
> + ({ void *p__; asm volatile ("mov %%" RSP_REG ", %0" : "=r" (p__)); p__; })
Is the mov instruction needed at all?
Would:
```
({ register void * p__ __asm__("rsp"); asm volatile("" : "=r"(p__)); p__; });
```
work?
> #else
> # define CURRENT_STACK_FRAME __builtin_frame_address (0)
> #endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] nptl: x86_64: Use stackinfo.h definition for CURRENT_STACK_FRAME
2022-08-29 19:24 ` Noah Goldstein
@ 2022-08-29 20:20 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto @ 2022-08-29 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Noah Goldstein; +Cc: GNU C Library
On 29/08/22 16:24, Noah Goldstein wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 12:00 PM Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha
> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
>>
>> It avoids the possible warning of uninitialized 'frame' variable when
>> building with clang:
>>
>> ../sysdeps/nptl/jmp-unwind.c:27:42: error: variable 'frame' is
>> uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
>> __pthread_cleanup_upto (env->__jmpbuf, CURRENT_STACK_FRAME);
>>
>> It increases the generated code by one instruction:
>>
>> --- master
>> +++ patch
>> @@ -25068,11 +25068,11 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
>> 3db1b: 00 00
>> 3db1d: 48 89 44 24 08 mov %rax,0x8(%rsp)
>> 3db22: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
>> - 3db24: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
>> - 3db29: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax
>> - 3db30: 00 00
>> - 3db32: 75 0c jne 3db40
>> <_longjmp_unwind+0x30>
>> - 3db34: 48 89 e6 mov %rsp,%rsi
>> + 3db24: 48 89 e6 mov %rsp,%rsi
>> + 3db27: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
>> + 3db2c: 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 sub %fs:0x28,%rax
>> + 3db33: 00 00
>> + 3db35: 75 09 jne 3db40
>> <_longjmp_unwind+0x30>
>> 3db37: 48 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%rsp
>> 3db3b: e9 60 31 05 00 jmp 90ca0
>> <__GI___pthread_cleanup_upto>
>> 3db40: e8 4b ec 0e 00 call 12c790 <__stack_chk_fail>
>>
>> Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
>> ---
>> sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h b/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
>> index 63fdbcb27c..3ff95efee6 100644
>> --- a/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
>> +++ b/sysdeps/x86/nptl/pthreaddef.h
>> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
>> #ifdef __x86_64__
>> /* The frame pointer is not usable. */
>> # define CURRENT_STACK_FRAME \
>> - ({ register char *frame __asm__("rsp"); frame; })
>> + ({ void *p__; asm volatile ("mov %%" RSP_REG ", %0" : "=r" (p__)); p__; })
>
> Is the mov instruction needed at all?
>
> Would:
> ```
> ({ register void * p__ __asm__("rsp"); asm volatile("" : "=r"(p__)); p__; });
> ```
> work?
This works, thanks. I will send an update version.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-29 20:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-29 19:00 [PATCH] nptl: x86_64: Use stackinfo.h definition for CURRENT_STACK_FRAME Adhemerval Zanella
2022-08-29 19:24 ` Noah Goldstein
2022-08-29 20:20 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).