Update kernel version in syscall-names.list to 4.16

Update kernel version in syscall-names.list to 4.16

[Joseph Myers]

Linux 4.16 does not add any new syscalls; this patch updates the
version number in syscall-names.list to reflect that it's still
current for 4.16.

Tested with build-many-glibcs.py.

2018-04-03  Joseph Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list: Update kernel
	version to 4.16.

diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
index ffbc5f9..fab3ff2 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
 # names are only used if the installed kernel headers also provide
 # them.
 
-# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.15.
-kernel 4.15
+# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.16.
+kernel 4.16
 
 FAST_atomic_update
 FAST_cmpxchg

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Re: Update kernel version in syscall-names.list to 4.16

[Dmitry V. Levin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 270 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 09:40:46PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> Linux 4.16 does not add any new syscalls;

Yes, this is the case.

> this patch updates the
> version number in syscall-names.list to reflect that it's still
> current for 4.16.

OK


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

Update kernel version in syscall-names.list to 4.16

[DJ Delorie]

Linux 4.16 does not add any new syscalls; this patch updates the
version number in syscall-names.list to reflect that it's still
current for 4.16.

Tested for x86_64 (compilation with build-many-glibcs.py, using Linux
4.16).

2018-04-12  DJ Delorie  <dj@redhat.com>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list: Update kernel
	version to 4.16.

diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
index ffbc5f97e9..fab3ff2328 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
 # names are only used if the installed kernel headers also provide
 # them.
 
-# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.15.
-kernel 4.15
+# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.16.
+kernel 4.16
 
 FAST_atomic_update
 FAST_cmpxchg

Re: Update kernel version in syscall-names.list to 4.16

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 04/12/2018 02:24 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Linux 4.16 does not add any new syscalls; this patch updates the
> version number in syscall-names.list to reflect that it's still
> current for 4.16.
> 
> Tested for x86_64 (compilation with build-many-glibcs.py, using Linux
> 4.16).
> 
> 2018-04-12  DJ Delorie  <dj@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list: Update kernel
> 	version to 4.16.

OK to commit if you reviewed the results across all arches from
build-many-glibcs.py and verified no new syscalls were detected?

Thanks for updating this.

Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>

> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
> index ffbc5f97e9..fab3ff2328 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscall-names.list
> @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@
>  # names are only used if the installed kernel headers also provide
>  # them.
>  
> -# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.15.
> -kernel 4.15
> +# The list of system calls is current as of Linux 4.16.
> +kernel 4.16
>  
>  FAST_atomic_update
>  FAST_cmpxchg
> 


-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.

Re: Update kernel version in syscall-names.list to 4.16

[DJ Delorie]

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> OK to commit if you reviewed the results across all arches from
> build-many-glibcs.py and verified no new syscalls were detected?

I did, yes.

Re: Update kernel version in syscall-names.list to 4.16

[Dmitry V. Levin]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 354 bytes --]

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 03:47:33PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> > OK to commit if you reviewed the results across all arches from
> > build-many-glibcs.py and verified no new syscalls were detected?
> 
> I did, yes.

See also
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-04/msg00110.html


-- 
ldv

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]