From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] elf: Support DT_RELR relative relocation format [BZ #27924]
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 22:30:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110182229250.139834@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpS26-_4W5NFZrf+jasFJuGvMOOOif+458T9KWHNmXdBQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote:
> If a binary requires a new glibc to run, running it with the old glibc will
> lead to an ld.so diagnostic message. DT_RELR shouldn't be different.
My point is that in many cases (for example, a binary using a new flag as
an argument to a function taking a flags argument) it *won't* lead to an
ld.so diagnostic message, just to the relevant function call misbehaving
at runtime.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-18 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-17 0:50 Fangrui Song
2021-10-18 14:42 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 16:16 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-18 17:28 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 18:15 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-18 18:27 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 19:19 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-18 19:44 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 20:11 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-18 21:10 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-18 22:27 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 22:30 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2021-10-18 22:42 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 23:00 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-18 23:36 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 23:44 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-19 1:05 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-18 19:21 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-18 19:45 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-29 18:21 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-10-29 18:36 ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-29 19:15 ` Fangrui Song
2021-10-29 18:38 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2021-10-29 19:35 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-10-29 19:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-11-01 4:50 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110182229250.139834@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).