* Monday Patch Queue Review update (2023-02-20)
@ 2023-02-20 14:57 Carlos O'Donell
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Carlos O'Donell @ 2023-02-20 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha
Most recent meeting status is always here:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PatchworkReviewMeetings#Update
Meeting: 2023-02-20 @ 0900h EST5EDT
Video/Audio: https://bbb.linuxfoundation.org/room/adm-alk-1uu-7fu
IRC: #glibc on OFTC.
Review new patches and restart review at the top.
* State NEW delegate NOBODY at 222
* Carlos' SLI at 163 days.
* Starting at 65235
* Started discussing Arjun's failures on s390x.
* Florian: Fedora builds against the z13 baseline.
* Related commit: 22999b2f0fb62eed1af4095d062bd1272d6afeb1
* Related commit: 7ea510127e2067efa07865158ac92c330c379950
* Adhemerval: s390x build tests:
* -march=z900, -march=z10, -march=z196, default
* Review the earlier commits for impact on z13
* Review build-many-glibcs configuration with -march= baselines for testing.
* Adhemerval noted that Gentoo was discussing stable backport policy.
* The open question is about hardware performance backports.
* 65235: Added Redirects to longdouble error functions [BZ #29033]
* Impacts ppc64le ieee754 long double. IBM to review?
* build: All microbenchmarks should output in JSON. (bug 27740)
* Ask Siddhesh to review.
* Remap __GLIBC_FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 0 if __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ is -1
* Needs senior review for generic code. Will come back to this next week.
* [v2] C2x scanf binary constant handling (Joseph)
* Adhemerval to review.
* implement dlmem() with audit extensions (Stas Sergeev)
* Adhemerval: dlmem() needs some very specific requirements and memory cannot follow what dlopen will do regarding mmap flags.
* Carlos: What is our use case here? Why?
* Florian: Use memfd? Security review will eventually block fds since it can be used to inject created code.
* Needs senior reviewer to discuss use cases.
* Carlos will review the use case on list.
* i386: Use pthread_barrier for synchronization on tst-bz21269 (Adhemerval)
* Carlos to ask DJ to review for CI/CD impact.
* Szabolcs: What about libmvec review?
* Raising the minimum requirement to gcc 10. Distro gcc?
* Florian: It is possible to build libmvec only if gcc is 10 or newer?
* Historically libmvec has different versions and we had an Intel, AMD, and GNU ABI.
* Some projects also implement what libmvec does in a single DSO to override.
* Carlos: For rpm-based distros you could backport libmvec.so.
* Florian: For libcrypt we define the function in the header and not always include it.
* Adhemerval: Do we define the prototype?
* Carlos: Yes, gcc has to know, and you add the pragma.
* Szabolcs: No header magic yet. Explicit decls. Manually call the symbols.
* Carlos: The risk is not at the distro level, because glibc 2.38 using distros will use newer gcc, so raising the baseline is less risk. The risk is in the glibc/gcc developer workflow impact.
* Szabolcs: Making the libmvec.so non-optional seems safer.
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-02-20 14:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-20 14:57 Monday Patch Queue Review update (2023-02-20) Carlos O'Donell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).