public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Nicholas Guriev <nicholas@guriev.su>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] elf: Rewrite long RESOLVE_MAP macro to a debug friendly function
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:03:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d49fb8b9-c4bf-7a70-b14a-40fd6703106a@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9db7a4b9-7b2a-78fd-a42e-9f8470060ce2@linaro.org>

On 23/05/2022 21:52, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>  From ed159672eb3cd650a32b7e5cb4d5ec1fe0e63802 I take that even always_inline
> might fail for some reason.  So we need to keep using always_inline on function
> that need to be inline to get a compiler warning if it can not be done.
> 
> I think by using -Winline with stardand C99 static inline, besides being
> slight more portable code is also less error prone (since it is one less
> annotation to take care of).  It would be slight better to setup -Winline
> per TU, instead of global since we only need always_inline semantic for
> specific usages.
> 
> In the end I think both a pretty equivalent.

That is surprising, and kinda defeats the "always" in the always_inline. 
  The documentation for the attribute also states that failure to inline 
a function is diagnosed as an error[1], except when the function is 
called indirectly and maybe some more context is needed for 
ed159672eb3cd650a32b7e5cb4d5ec1fe0e63802 to understand the nature of the 
warnings.

So I can't agree yet that it's equivalent, but I do agree that the 
always_inline semantic is for specific use cases.

Thanks,
Siddhesh

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-02 14:51 [PATCH] " Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-02 21:20 ` Fangrui Song
2022-05-03 10:04   ` Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-03 20:12     ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2022-05-07 13:33       ` [PATCH v3] " Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-09 13:38         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-14 14:27           ` Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-14 22:48             ` Fangrui Song
2022-05-15  0:58               ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-22 22:24                 ` Fangrui Song
2022-05-23  7:28                   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-23 12:35                   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-05-23 13:02                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-23 16:22                       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-05-23 16:33                         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2022-05-23 16:56                           ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-05-03 19:14   ` [PATCH v2] " Nicholas Guriev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d49fb8b9-c4bf-7a70-b14a-40fd6703106a@gotplt.org \
    --to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=nicholas@guriev.su \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).