From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Nicholas Guriev <nicholas@guriev.su>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] elf: Rewrite long RESOLVE_MAP macro to a debug friendly function
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 22:03:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d49fb8b9-c4bf-7a70-b14a-40fd6703106a@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9db7a4b9-7b2a-78fd-a42e-9f8470060ce2@linaro.org>
On 23/05/2022 21:52, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> From ed159672eb3cd650a32b7e5cb4d5ec1fe0e63802 I take that even always_inline
> might fail for some reason. So we need to keep using always_inline on function
> that need to be inline to get a compiler warning if it can not be done.
>
> I think by using -Winline with stardand C99 static inline, besides being
> slight more portable code is also less error prone (since it is one less
> annotation to take care of). It would be slight better to setup -Winline
> per TU, instead of global since we only need always_inline semantic for
> specific usages.
>
> In the end I think both a pretty equivalent.
That is surprising, and kinda defeats the "always" in the always_inline.
The documentation for the attribute also states that failure to inline
a function is diagnosed as an error[1], except when the function is
called indirectly and maybe some more context is needed for
ed159672eb3cd650a32b7e5cb4d5ec1fe0e63802 to understand the nature of the
warnings.
So I can't agree yet that it's equivalent, but I do agree that the
always_inline semantic is for specific use cases.
Thanks,
Siddhesh
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-02 14:51 [PATCH] " Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-02 21:20 ` Fangrui Song
2022-05-03 10:04 ` Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-03 20:12 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2022-05-07 13:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-09 13:38 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-14 14:27 ` Nicholas Guriev
2022-05-14 22:48 ` Fangrui Song
2022-05-15 0:58 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-22 22:24 ` Fangrui Song
2022-05-23 7:28 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-23 12:35 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-05-23 13:02 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-05-23 16:22 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-05-23 16:33 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2022-05-23 16:56 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2022-05-03 19:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Nicholas Guriev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d49fb8b9-c4bf-7a70-b14a-40fd6703106a@gotplt.org \
--to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=nicholas@guriev.su \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).