From: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.ibm.com>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] Fix race in pthread_mutex_lock while promoting to PTHREAD_MUTEX_ELISION_NP [BZ #23275]
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 11:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fe70ace4-4f60-d169-9157-63197b0f8950@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8e0d0ec6-5071-1d15-1f40-20a4928871a0@linux.ibm.com>
PING
On 07/10/2018 08:33 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
> PING
>
> On 07/03/2018 08:28 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
>> PING
>>
>> On 06/26/2018 08:45 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
>>> PING
>>>
>>> On 06/19/2018 09:45 AM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
>>>> PING
>>>>
>>>> On 06/12/2018 04:24 PM, Stefan Liebler wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The race leads either to pthread_mutex_destroy returning EBUSY or
>>>>> triggering an assertion (See description in bugzilla).
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch is fixing the race by ensuring that the elision path is
>>>>> used in all cases if elision is enabled by the GLIBC_TUNABLES
>>>>> framework.
>>>>>
>>>>> The __kind variable in struct __pthread_mutex_s is accessed
>>>>> concurrently. Therefore we are now using the atomic macros.
>>>>>
>>>>> The new testcase tst-mutex10 is triggering the race on s390x and
>>>>> intel. Presumably also on power, but I don't have access to a power
>>>>> machine with lock-elision. At least the code for power is the same
>>>>> as on the other two architectures. Can somebody test it on power?
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>>
>>>>> ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â [BZ #23275]
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/tst-mutex10.c: New File.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/Makefile (tests): Add tst-mutex10.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â (tst-mutex-ENV): New variable.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/force-elision.h: (FORCE_ELISION):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Ensure that elision path is used if elision is available.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/force-elision.h
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â (FORCE_ELISION): Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/force-elision.h: (FORCE_ELISION):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthreadP.h (PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE,
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â PTHREAD_MUTEX_TYPE_ELISION, PTHREAD_MUTEX_PSHARED):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Use atomic_load_relaxed.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_consistent.c (pthread_mutex_consistent):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_getprioceiling.c
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â (pthread_mutex_getprioceiling): Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c (__pthread_mutex_lock_full,
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â __pthread_mutex_cond_lock_adjust): Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_setprioceiling.c
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â (pthread_mutex_setprioceiling): Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_timedlock.c (__pthread_mutex_timedlock):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_trylock.c (__pthread_mutex_trylock):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_unlock.c (__pthread_mutex_unlock_full):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Likewise.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * sysdeps/nptl/bits/thread-shared-types.h
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â (struct __pthread_mutex_s): Add comments.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_destroy.c (__pthread_mutex_destroy):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Use atomic_load_relaxed and atomic_store_relaxed.
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â * nptl/pthread_mutex_init.c (__pthread_mutex_init):
>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Use atomic_store_relaxed.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-16 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-12 14:25 [PATCH] " Stefan Liebler
2018-06-13 8:43 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-13 9:18 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-06-13 9:36 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-13 15:25 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-06-14 8:04 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-06-13 21:45 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2018-06-19 7:45 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-06-26 6:45 ` [PING][PATCH] " Stefan Liebler
2018-07-03 6:28 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-07-10 6:34 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-07-16 11:57 ` Stefan Liebler [this message]
2018-07-23 6:42 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-07-30 7:22 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-08-27 9:12 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-09-03 7:10 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-09-10 12:01 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-09-17 13:38 ` [PATCH] " Florian Weimer
2018-10-04 16:08 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-10-16 14:23 ` Florian Weimer
2018-10-17 10:36 ` Stefan Liebler
2018-10-18 13:24 ` [COMMITTED 2.27 / 2.28] " Stefan Liebler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fe70ace4-4f60-d169-9157-63197b0f8950@linux.ibm.com \
--to=stli@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).