From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move __gmon_start__ call out of .init section
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:32:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15818.59920.66031.178917@napali.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200211072227.gA7MRZq29175@magilla.sf.frob.com>
>>>>> On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 14:27:35 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> said:
>> The problem is that the unwind info for the .init/.fini section
>> will be incorrect if it contains any function call.
Roland> I don't really see why it should matter for these functions
Roland> (when do you unwind through them?), but I can take your word
Roland> for it that it does.
It matters during debugging for example (that's how I originally found
the problem). There are other reasons. For example, a profiling tool
might want to periodically create a stack trace to create call-graph
profiles.
Roland> It's a weak reference and so might be zero. There is no
Roland> provision in the spec for preinit_array elements being zero,
Roland> so it would be questionable to have it skip them (rather
Roland> than a user putting a random zero into the array getting the
Roland> crash he deserves).
We wouldn't be putting __gmon_init__ directly into .preinit---we would
put a function there which will then check whether __gmon_init__ is
NULL and, if not, call it.
Roland> It sounds like this is really an ia64-specific issue and so
Roland> there isn't any question of wanting to do this for the other
Roland> platforms. So I will put your change in.
OK, thanks.
Roland> Please fix whatever you are using to munge your diffs so
Roland> that it produces correct file names instead of the garbage
Roland> all your recent patches have contained. After today I won't
Roland> be in the mood to manually unmunge patches that can't be
Roland> applied by any single -pN setting.
Hmmh, I'm sorry about that. I was using a script that Uli sent me
some time ago. I'm not a (heavy) CVS user but Uli told me that the
patches created by "cvs diff -U" are broken. What's the recommend way
to create a diff from the glibc CVS?
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-07 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-30 7:00 David Mosberger
2002-11-07 13:45 ` Roland McGrath
2002-11-07 14:08 ` David Mosberger
2002-11-07 14:27 ` Roland McGrath
2002-11-07 14:32 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2002-11-07 17:43 ` Roland McGrath
2002-11-08 3:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-08 11:15 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15818.59920.66031.178917@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).