public inbox for libc-hacker@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] move __gmon_start__ call out of .init section
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 14:27:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200211072227.gA7MRZq29175@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: David Mosberger's message of  Thursday, 7 November 2002 14:08:45 -0800 <15818.58477.531836.650663@napali.hpl.hp.com>

> The problem is that the unwind info for the .init/.fini section will
> be incorrect if it contains any function call.

I don't really see why it should matter for these functions (when do you
unwind through them?), but I can take your word for it that it does.

> That's true, but .init is deprecated on ia64 anyhow.  If legacy code
> doesn't get profiled because it was using .init, I doubt that's a big
> loss.

Ok.  

> Perhaps the call could be moved into .preinit_array?  I'm not entirely
> sure whether that would be safe though.

It's a weak reference and so might be zero.  There is no provision in the
spec for preinit_array elements being zero, so it would be questionable to
have it skip them (rather than a user putting a random zero into the array
getting the crash he deserves).


It sounds like this is really an ia64-specific issue and so there isn't any
question of wanting to do this for the other platforms.  So I will put your
change in.  Please fix whatever you are using to munge your diffs so that
it produces correct file names instead of the garbage all your recent
patches have contained.  After today I won't be in the mood to manually
unmunge patches that can't be applied by any single -pN setting.


Thanks,
Roland

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-07 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-30  7:00 David Mosberger
2002-11-07 13:45 ` Roland McGrath
2002-11-07 14:08   ` David Mosberger
2002-11-07 14:27     ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2002-11-07 14:32       ` David Mosberger
2002-11-07 17:43         ` Roland McGrath
2002-11-08  3:05           ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-08 11:15           ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200211072227.gA7MRZq29175@magilla.sf.frob.com \
    --to=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).