* [PATCH] Shut up gcc on include/ctype.h
@ 2003-07-29 17:17 Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-29 22:31 ` Roland McGrath
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2003-07-29 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ulrich Drepper, Roland McGrath; +Cc: Glibc hackers
Hi!
I remember we were discussing this, but don't remember the results.
Anyway, this patch seems to make zero difference on generated code
while shutting up the warning.
2003-07-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* include/ctype.h (__ctype_b_loc, __ctype_toupper_loc,
__ctype_tolower_loc): Avoid "dereferencing type-punned pointer will
break strict-aliasing rules" warnings.
--- libc/include/ctype.h.jj 2003-03-17 19:37:46.000000000 -0500
+++ libc/include/ctype.h 2003-07-29 13:12:30.000000000 -0400
@@ -25,31 +25,43 @@ __libc_tsd_define (extern, CTYPE_TOLOWER
CTYPE_EXTERN_INLINE const uint16_t ** __attribute__ ((const))
__ctype_b_loc (void)
{
- const uint16_t **tablep =
- (const uint16_t **) __libc_tsd_address (CTYPE_B);
- if (__builtin_expect (*tablep == NULL, 0))
- *tablep = (const uint16_t *) _NL_CURRENT (LC_CTYPE, _NL_CTYPE_CLASS) + 128;
- return tablep;
+ union
+ {
+ void **ptr;
+ const uint16_t **tablep;
+ } u;
+ u.ptr = __libc_tsd_address (CTYPE_B);
+ if (__builtin_expect (*u.tablep == NULL, 0))
+ *u.tablep = (const uint16_t *) _NL_CURRENT (LC_CTYPE, _NL_CTYPE_CLASS) + 128;
+ return u.tablep;
}
CTYPE_EXTERN_INLINE const int32_t ** __attribute__ ((const))
__ctype_toupper_loc (void)
{
- const int32_t **tablep =
- (const int32_t **) __libc_tsd_address (CTYPE_TOUPPER);
- if (__builtin_expect (*tablep == NULL, 0))
- *tablep = ((int32_t *) _NL_CURRENT (LC_CTYPE, _NL_CTYPE_TOUPPER) + 128);
- return tablep;
+ union
+ {
+ void **ptr;
+ const int32_t **tablep;
+ } u;
+ u.ptr = __libc_tsd_address (CTYPE_TOUPPER);
+ if (__builtin_expect (*u.tablep == NULL, 0))
+ *u.tablep = ((int32_t *) _NL_CURRENT (LC_CTYPE, _NL_CTYPE_TOUPPER) + 128);
+ return u.tablep;
}
CTYPE_EXTERN_INLINE const int32_t ** __attribute__ ((const))
__ctype_tolower_loc (void)
{
- const int32_t **tablep =
- (const int32_t **) __libc_tsd_address (CTYPE_TOLOWER);
- if (__builtin_expect (*tablep == NULL, 0))
- *tablep = ((int32_t *) _NL_CURRENT (LC_CTYPE, _NL_CTYPE_TOLOWER) + 128);
- return tablep;
+ union
+ {
+ void **ptr;
+ const int32_t **tablep;
+ } u;
+ u.ptr = __libc_tsd_address (CTYPE_TOLOWER);
+ if (__builtin_expect (*u.tablep == NULL, 0))
+ *u.tablep = ((int32_t *) _NL_CURRENT (LC_CTYPE, _NL_CTYPE_TOLOWER) + 128);
+ return u.tablep;
}
# endif /* Not NOT_IN_libc. */
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Shut up gcc on include/ctype.h
2003-07-29 17:17 [PATCH] Shut up gcc on include/ctype.h Jakub Jelinek
@ 2003-07-29 22:31 ` Roland McGrath
2003-07-29 23:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2003-07-29 22:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Ulrich Drepper, Glibc hackers
> I remember we were discussing this, but don't remember the results.
> Anyway, this patch seems to make zero difference on generated code
> while shutting up the warning.
Hmm. We went a few rounds on this at the beginning, and my recollection
was that I couldn't find a formulation that didn't produce some warning or
other. Did the compiler change? Or did I just overlook the obvious fix?
Thanks,
Roland
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Shut up gcc on include/ctype.h
2003-07-29 22:31 ` Roland McGrath
@ 2003-07-29 23:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2003-07-29 23:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roland McGrath; +Cc: Ulrich Drepper, Glibc hackers
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:31:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I remember we were discussing this, but don't remember the results.
> > Anyway, this patch seems to make zero difference on generated code
> > while shutting up the warning.
>
> Hmm. We went a few rounds on this at the beginning, and my recollection
> was that I couldn't find a formulation that didn't produce some warning or
> other. Did the compiler change? Or did I just overlook the obvious fix?
I don't think it did.
But certainly I don't get a single warning about ctype.h with the posted
patch in gcc-3.3-16 (and gcc-3.2.x did not even had that warning).
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-29 23:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-29 17:17 [PATCH] Shut up gcc on include/ctype.h Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-29 22:31 ` Roland McGrath
2003-07-29 23:34 ` Jakub Jelinek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).