public inbox for libc-hacker@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ready for 2.3?
@ 2002-09-27 23:47 Ulrich Drepper
  2002-09-28  4:51 ` Thorsten Kukuk
  2002-09-28 15:02 ` Roland McGrath
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Drepper @ 2002-09-27 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GNU libc hacker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

With the regex problem solved all the not unimportant issues are
resolved.  Unless somebody sees a problem let's throw 2.3 out so that we
actually get some testing done.  We'll probably have a 2.3.1 release
fairly soon so that the missing ppc64 and hppa patches will also be
available in an official release in the very near future.

- -- 
- ---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9lVB12ijCOnn/RHQRArDuAJwOXmNrhPb7PYg+lYQyaOCfHcQpxQCgrQZO
ZtD+zfWhS+LcDv2+qqi2gbs=
=QcfU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: ready for 2.3?
  2002-09-27 23:47 ready for 2.3? Ulrich Drepper
@ 2002-09-28  4:51 ` Thorsten Kukuk
  2002-09-28 12:14   ` Ulrich Drepper
  2002-09-28 15:02 ` Roland McGrath
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Kukuk @ 2002-09-28  4:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulrich Drepper; +Cc: GNU libc hacker


Hi Uli,

there is one patch for the nice() emulation from me, where I and
Andreas Jaeger already asked you for inclusion in the official tree,
but never got an answer. Since all Linux Distributions have this
patch in their glibc version, I think we should include it in the
official release.

The problem is, that, if the result of the current priority of a
process and the added nice value is out of the priority range, nice
should return the new priority which is really used, and not our
calculated value:

2002-03-02  Thorsten Kukuk  <kukuk@suse.de>

        * sysdeps/unix/nice.c: Use getpriority() for the return value

--- sysdeps/unix/nice.c
+++ sysdeps/unix/nice.c 2002/03/02 09:40:14
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
 
   result = setpriority (PRIO_PROCESS, 0, prio + incr);
   if (result != -1)
-    return prio + incr;
+    return getpriority (PRIO_PROCESS, 0);
   else
     return -1;

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG        Deutschherrnstr. 15-19        D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: ready for 2.3?
  2002-09-28  4:51 ` Thorsten Kukuk
@ 2002-09-28 12:14   ` Ulrich Drepper
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Drepper @ 2002-09-28 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thorsten Kukuk; +Cc: GNU libc hacker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thorsten Kukuk wrote:

>         * sysdeps/unix/nice.c: Use getpriority() for the return value

I've applied the patch.  Thanks,

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQE9lf932ijCOnn/RHQRAt3DAKC9lDfzJn5kYLUdGZgv/p0MocBCpgCWKuhe
OSmM2WUeUQFCIcsvp6W2JQ==
=wCKT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: ready for 2.3?
  2002-09-27 23:47 ready for 2.3? Ulrich Drepper
  2002-09-28  4:51 ` Thorsten Kukuk
@ 2002-09-28 15:02 ` Roland McGrath
  2002-09-28 15:34   ` Ulrich Drepper
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Roland McGrath @ 2002-09-28 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ulrich Drepper; +Cc: GNU libc hacker

The Hurd build still has some problems.  I am ok with those not getting
fixed in the 2.3 release (hopefully fixed in 2.3.1).  But I don't know if
this will be a real pain for the Debian/Hurd people.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: ready for 2.3?
  2002-09-28 15:02 ` Roland McGrath
@ 2002-09-28 15:34   ` Ulrich Drepper
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ulrich Drepper @ 2002-09-28 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Roland McGrath; +Cc: GNU libc hacker

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Roland McGrath wrote:
> The Hurd build still has some problems.  I am ok with those not getting
> fixed in the 2.3 release (hopefully fixed in 2.3.1).  But I don't know if
> this will be a real pain for the Debian/Hurd people.

I haven't seen anybody rushing in to help.  And that although they were
on notivce for a month now.  So it cannot be problematic for them.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9li5m2ijCOnn/RHQRAu1EAKCDVK82VsMqONrOMpwpmBUroxneqgCff0V+
OUxJSlOaB7qfY/SjTwCZZCI=
=IJm0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-09-28 22:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-27 23:47 ready for 2.3? Ulrich Drepper
2002-09-28  4:51 ` Thorsten Kukuk
2002-09-28 12:14   ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-09-28 15:02 ` Roland McGrath
2002-09-28 15:34   ` Ulrich Drepper

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).