mq support etc

mq support etc

[Ulrich Drepper]

As you can see, the POSIX message queue support is in.  Mostly written
by Jakub, I write the mq_notify code for SIGEV_THREAD.  Works nicely on
x86.  Now we are all waiting for the other archs to catch up.

I've also added Roland's test case for the POSIX timer removal.  This
means the tst-timer3 test will fail unless the machine uses a recent
kernel or uses the userlevel implementation.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Re: mq support etc

[Andreas Jaeger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 715 bytes --]

Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes:

> As you can see, the POSIX message queue support is in.  Mostly written
> by Jakub, I write the mq_notify code for SIGEV_THREAD.  Works nicely on
> x86.  Now we are all waiting for the other archs to catch up.

Thanks!

Looking through the patches, the only patch that looks do be done for
other archs is the following in linuxthreads:
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sysdep-cancel.h (CENABLE): Define
	for librt.
	(CDISABLE): Likewise.

Is that correct?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: mq support etc

[Ulrich Drepper]

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> Looking through the patches, the only patch that looks do be done for
> other archs is the following in linuxthreads:
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/sysdep-cancel.h (CENABLE): Define
> 	for librt.
> 	(CDISABLE): Likewise.

The libc  side is done, yes, but the kernel isn't.  Which means the libc
side awaits testing as well.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖