public inbox for libc-hacker@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x
@ 2002-10-09 10:00 Martin Schwidefsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2002-10-09 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: libc-hacker


> I personally think this is the right way to go too.

Ok then. Ulrich: would you please apply Jakubs configure patch as well?

blue skies,
   Martin

Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x
  2002-10-09  7:05 ` [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x Jakub Jelinek
@ 2002-10-15 15:26   ` Andreas Jaeger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2002-10-15 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Martin Schwidefsky, libc-hacker

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>> All I can say is: he is right. I wanted to look into versioned symbols for
>> the glibc functions that are affected by the utmp.h/utmpx.h change but I
>> am too busy with other stuff right now (and I know that extreme caution
>> is required for anything to do with versioning).
>
> Don't you need following too?
>
> 2002-10-09  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in: Use */lib64 for s390x too.
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure: Rebuilt.

I'm going to  apply this now,
Andreas

>
> --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in	28 Sep 2002 20:39:35 -0000	1.1.1.17
> +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in	9 Oct 2002 11:14:45 -0000	1.14
> @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ fi
>  if test "$prefix" = "/usr" -o "$prefix" = "/usr/"; then
>    # 64bit libraries on sparc go to /lib64 and not /lib
>    if test "$machine" = "sparc/sparc64" -o "$machine" = "x86_64" \
> -	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64"; then
> +	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64" \
> +	  -o "$machine" = "s390/s390-64"; then
>      libc_cv_slibdir="/lib64"
>      if test "$libdir" = '${exec_prefix}/lib'; then
>        libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib64';
> --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure	28 Sep 2002 20:39:35 -0000	1.1.1.17
> +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure	9 Oct 2002 11:14:45 -0000	1.14
> @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ fi
>  if test "$prefix" = "/usr" -o "$prefix" = "/usr/"; then
>    # 64bit libraries on sparc go to /lib64 and not /lib
>    if test "$machine" = "sparc/sparc64" -o "$machine" = "x86_64" \
> -	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64"; then
> +	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64" \
> +	  -o "$machine" = "s390/s390-64"; then
>      libc_cv_slibdir="/lib64"
>      if test "$libdir" = '${exec_prefix}/lib'; then
>        libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib64';
>
> 	Jakub
>

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x
  2002-10-09  7:35 Martin Schwidefsky
@ 2002-10-09  7:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2002-10-09  7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Schwidefsky; +Cc: libc-hacker

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 04:29:55PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> 
> >Don't you need following too?
> >
> >2002-10-09  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> >
>  >* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in: Use */lib64 for s390x too.
>  >* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure: Rebuilt.
> 
> We need this one IF we want to switch to the */lib64 scheme of doing
> things. The SuSE distribution goes this way, RedHat has not implemented
> it yet. Did this make it to the LSB? Or do we simply decide that this
> is the way to go? I personally think it is the right thing to do but
> how "official" is this?

I personally think this is the right way to go too.

	Jakub

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x
@ 2002-10-09  7:35 Martin Schwidefsky
  2002-10-09  7:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2002-10-09  7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: libc-hacker


>Don't you need following too?
>
>2002-10-09  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
 >* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in: Use */lib64 for s390x too.
 >* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure: Rebuilt.

We need this one IF we want to switch to the */lib64 scheme of doing
things. The SuSE distribution goes this way, RedHat has not implemented
it yet. Did this make it to the LSB? Or do we simply decide that this
is the way to go? I personally think it is the right thing to do but
how "official" is this?

blue skies,
   Martin

Linux/390 Design & Development, IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
Schönaicherstr. 220, D-71032 Böblingen, Telefon: 49 - (0)7031 - 16-2247
E-Mail: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x
  2002-10-09  6:15 utmp.h & utmpx.h for s390 Martin Schwidefsky
@ 2002-10-09  7:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
  2002-10-15 15:26   ` Andreas Jaeger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2002-10-09  7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Martin Schwidefsky; +Cc: libc-hacker

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> All I can say is: he is right. I wanted to look into versioned symbols for
> the glibc functions that are affected by the utmp.h/utmpx.h change but I
> am too busy with other stuff right now (and I know that extreme caution
> is required for anything to do with versioning).

Don't you need following too?

2002-10-09  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in: Use */lib64 for s390x too.
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure: Rebuilt.

--- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in	28 Sep 2002 20:39:35 -0000	1.1.1.17
+++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure.in	9 Oct 2002 11:14:45 -0000	1.14
@@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ fi
 if test "$prefix" = "/usr" -o "$prefix" = "/usr/"; then
   # 64bit libraries on sparc go to /lib64 and not /lib
   if test "$machine" = "sparc/sparc64" -o "$machine" = "x86_64" \
-	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64"; then
+	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64" \
+	  -o "$machine" = "s390/s390-64"; then
     libc_cv_slibdir="/lib64"
     if test "$libdir" = '${exec_prefix}/lib'; then
       libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib64';
--- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure	28 Sep 2002 20:39:35 -0000	1.1.1.17
+++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/configure	9 Oct 2002 11:14:45 -0000	1.14
@@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ fi
 if test "$prefix" = "/usr" -o "$prefix" = "/usr/"; then
   # 64bit libraries on sparc go to /lib64 and not /lib
   if test "$machine" = "sparc/sparc64" -o "$machine" = "x86_64" \
-	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64"; then
+	  -o "$machine" = "powerpc/powerpc64" \
+	  -o "$machine" = "s390/s390-64"; then
     libc_cv_slibdir="/lib64"
     if test "$libdir" = '${exec_prefix}/lib'; then
       libdir='${exec_prefix}/lib64';

	Jakub

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-15  7:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-09 10:00 [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x Martin Schwidefsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-09  7:35 Martin Schwidefsky
2002-10-09  7:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-10-09  6:15 utmp.h & utmpx.h for s390 Martin Schwidefsky
2002-10-09  7:05 ` [PATCH] */lib64 for s390x Jakub Jelinek
2002-10-15 15:26   ` Andreas Jaeger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).