__syscall_execve on ia64

__syscall_execve on ia64

[Andreas Schwab]

Nobody came up with a better solution.

Andreas.

2002-10-21  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>

	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list (s_execve): Set
	caller to EXTRA instead of execve, since the latter has a
	higher-priority implementation in linuxthreads.

--- sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list.~1.22.~	2002-10-14 11:07:07.000000000 +0200
+++ sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list	2002-10-14 16:13:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ rt_sigsuspend	EXTRA	rt_sigsuspend	i:pi	_
 rt_sigtimedwait	EXTRA	rt_sigtimedwait	i:pppi	__syscall_rt_sigtimedwait	rt_sigtimedwait
 
 # System calls with wrappers.
-s_execve	execve	execve		i:spp	__syscall_execve
+s_execve	EXTRA	execve		i:spp	__syscall_execve
 s_exit		exit	exit		i:i	__syscall_exit
 s_getcwd	getcwd	getcwd		i:pi	__syscall_getcwd	getcwd
 s_getdents	getdents getdents	i:ipi	__syscall_getdents	getdents

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Re: __syscall_execve on ia64

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 04:28:57PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Nobody came up with a better solution.

Well, I wrote ia64 INLINE_SYSCALL, just need to improve it a little bit
(ATM it generated warnings whenever first syscall argument was a pointer)
and submit.
But the extra for now doesn't hurt (and once INLINE_SYSCALL is in, all the
__syscall_* from ia64/syscalls.list can go away).

> 2002-10-21  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>
> 
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/ia64/syscalls.list (s_execve): Set
> 	caller to EXTRA instead of execve, since the latter has a
> 	higher-priority implementation in linuxthreads.

	Jakub