* [Bug localedata/10502] sorting between Indic Languages should be as per unicode code point
[not found] <bug-10502-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-07-01 9:36 ` fweimer at redhat dot com
2016-04-07 18:18 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: fweimer at redhat dot com @ 2014-07-01 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-locales
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10502
Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |security-
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug localedata/10502] sorting between Indic Languages should be as per unicode code point
[not found] <bug-10502-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2014-07-01 9:36 ` [Bug localedata/10502] sorting between Indic Languages should be as per unicode code point fweimer at redhat dot com
@ 2016-04-07 18:18 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
2018-09-15 14:46 ` pravin.d.s at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: vapier at gentoo dot org @ 2016-04-07 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-locales
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10502
--- Comment #1 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> ---
can you post some example unicode data that shows incorrect sorting ? that'll
make it easier for us to integrate into tests to prevent future regressions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug localedata/10502] sorting between Indic Languages should be as per unicode code point
[not found] <bug-10502-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
2014-07-01 9:36 ` [Bug localedata/10502] sorting between Indic Languages should be as per unicode code point fweimer at redhat dot com
2016-04-07 18:18 ` vapier at gentoo dot org
@ 2018-09-15 14:46 ` pravin.d.s at gmail dot com
2024-01-05 11:38 ` maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
2024-01-05 11:38 ` maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pravin.d.s at gmail dot com @ 2018-09-15 14:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-locales
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10502
--- Comment #2 from Pravin S <pravin.d.s at gmail dot com> ---
Hi Mike,
This is not about incorrect sorting. But what should be order when different
scripts come together. Example:
I think order for these codepoints should be as follows:
u+0915, u+0995, u+0A15, u+0A95, u+0B15, u+0B95
I dont remember any reference as of now, but when we decide sorting order
between different Unicode script, what should we follow? And IMO answer is
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCA/latest/allkeys.txt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug localedata/10502] sorting between Indic Languages should be as per unicode code point
[not found] <bug-10502-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-09-15 14:46 ` pravin.d.s at gmail dot com
@ 2024-01-05 11:38 ` maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
2024-01-05 11:38 ` maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com @ 2024-01-05 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-locales
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10502
Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
In 2018, we updated the iso14651_t1_common to a 2016 version and then adapted
the sort order of many locales. So the sort order of these Indic languages
should now be in sync with the DUCET
(http://www.unicode.org/Public/UCA/latest/allkeys.txt) as approximately defined
in 2016. So I think the problem in the original comment is fixed.
commit 9479b6d5e08eacce06c6ab60abc9b2f4eb8b71e4
Author: Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Jan 30 17:59:00 2018 +0100
Update iso14651_t1_common file to ISO14651_2016_TABLE1_en.txt [BZ #14095]
[BZ #14095] - Review / update collation data from Unicode / ISO 14651
File downloaded from:
http://standards.iso.org/iso-iec/14651/ed-4/ISO14651_2016_TABLE1_en.txt
Updating this file alone is not enough, there are problems in the new
file which need to be fixed and the collation rules for many locales
need to be adapted. This is done by the following patches.
This update also fixes the problem that many characters are treated as
identical when sorting because they were not yet in the old
iso14651_t1_common file, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336308
- Infinite (∞) and empty set (∅) are treated as if they were the same
character by sort and uniq
[BZ #14095]
* localedata/locales/iso14651_t1_common: Update file to
latest version from ISO (ISO14651_2016_TABLE1_en.txt).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug localedata/10502] sorting between Indic Languages should be as per unicode code point
[not found] <bug-10502-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-01-05 11:38 ` maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
@ 2024-01-05 11:38 ` maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: maiku.fabian at gmail dot com @ 2024-01-05 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-locales
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10502
Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|libc-locales at sourceware dot org |maiku.fabian at gmail dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread