From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com>,
cross-distro@lists.linaro.org,
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"libc-ports@sourceware.org" <libc-ports@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120524170737.GR16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205231017070.5860@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:17:51AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for a release
> > > branch.
> > >
> > > R.
> >
> > There was agreement by all pushing for the change to use it. So, let's ask
> > the release managers about their opinion,
>
> I'm ok with the change - but of course only to carry one less patch
> in our local tree. What do others think? It would definitely (anyway)
> need documenting in changes.html (for both 4.7.1 and 4.8).
I'm ok with that change as well (again, would apply that too), but note that
it isn't effortless on the side of gcc users, with the patch in they either
need recent enough glibc, or at least make a compatiblity symlink.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-22 22:20 Michael Hope
2012-04-23 15:37 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-23 21:37 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-24 13:32 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-26 20:21 ` Carlos O'Donell
2012-04-26 23:27 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-30 15:24 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-30 21:48 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-30 22:01 ` Jeff Law
2012-05-01 2:44 ` Michael Hope
2012-05-01 3:46 ` Jeff Law
2012-05-01 8:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-05-23 7:13 ` Andreas Jaeger
2012-05-23 7:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-05-23 8:01 ` Andreas Jaeger
2012-05-23 8:18 ` Richard Guenther
2012-05-23 14:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-23 21:12 ` Michael Hope
2012-05-24 4:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-24 8:15 ` Andrew Haley
2012-05-25 0:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-25 8:24 ` Andrew Haley
2012-05-24 17:08 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2012-04-23 19:58 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120524170737.GR16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=aj@suse.com \
--cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
--cc=cross-distro@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).