Re: [PATCH] Don't build .os objects of static-only-routines for extra libs

["Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>]

On 03/12/2013 05:18 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> 	* extra-lib.mk (extra-objs): Add static-only-routines as .oS
> 	instead of .os.
> ---
>  extra-lib.mk | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/extra-lib.mk b/extra-lib.mk
> index a2293c5..247946f 100644
> --- a/extra-lib.mk
> +++ b/extra-lib.mk
> @@ -34,7 +34,12 @@ extra-objs += $(foreach o,$(filter-out .os .oS,$(object-suffixes-$(lib))),\
>  					   $($(lib)-shared-only-routines),\
>  					   $(all-$(lib)-routines))))
>  ifneq (,$(filter .os,$(object-suffixes-$(lib))))
> -extra-objs += $(all-$(lib)-routines:%=%.os)
> +extra-objs += $(patsubst %,%.os,$(filter-out $($(lib)-static-only-routines),\
> +					     $(all-$(lib)-routines)))
> +endif
> +ifneq (,$(filter .oS,$(object-suffixes-$(lib))))
> +extra-objs += $(patsubst %,%.oS,$(filter $($(lib)-static-only-routines),\
> +					 $(all-$(lib)-routines)))
>  endif
>  alltypes-$(lib) := $(foreach o,$(object-suffixes-$(lib)),\
>  			     $(objpfx)$(patsubst %,$(libtype$o),\
> 

Does this actually cause a problem building a library
using extra-lib.mk?

I'm trying to read the code and determine under which
conditions this would break one of the existing libraries
we build uding extra-lib.mk, but given my build logs it
looks like 

I understand that this is a correctness issue, but I was
just wondering if it has any actual impact on our builds
today.

Cheers,
Carlos.