From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, libc-ports@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] tst-chk1: add fd_set dynamic allocation test
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 02:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51808172.8060509@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365900451-19026-5-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
On 04/13/2013 08:47 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
> ---
> ChangeLog | 5 ++++
> debug/tst-chk1.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
> index 7cdece7..b154c3c 100644
> --- a/ChangeLog
> +++ b/ChangeLog
> @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
>
> 2013-03-25 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
>
> + * debug/tst-chk1.c (do_test): Added tests for fd_set allocation
> + from heap.
> +
> +2013-03-25 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
> +
> * debug/fdelt_chk.c (__fdelt_chk): Removed range check
> and renamed to __fdelt_nochk.
>
> diff --git a/debug/tst-chk1.c b/debug/tst-chk1.c
> index 6ca8d9d..2b225ad 100644
> --- a/debug/tst-chk1.c
> +++ b/debug/tst-chk1.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
> #include <sys/select.h>
> #include <sys/socket.h>
> #include <sys/un.h>
> -
> +#include <sys/param.h>
>
> #define obstack_chunk_alloc malloc
> #define obstack_chunk_free free
> @@ -1451,24 +1451,85 @@ do_test (void)
> #endif
>
> fd_set s;
> + fd_set *pfdset;
> FD_ZERO (&s);
> FD_SET (FD_SETSIZE - 1, &s);
> #if __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL >= 1
> CHK_FAIL_START
> FD_SET (FD_SETSIZE, &s);
> CHK_FAIL_END
Please add comments explaining *why* we are testing this usage
pattern e.g. Linux and BSDs support fds > FD_SETSIZE.
> +
> + pfdset = (fd_set*)calloc(howmany(FD_SETSIZE+1, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
> + if (pfdset == NULL) {
> + printf("malloc failed %m\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + FD_SET (FD_SETSIZE, pfdset);
> + free (pfdset);
> +
> + pfdset = (fd_set*)calloc(howmany(FD_SETSIZE*2, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
> + if (pfdset == NULL) {
> + printf("malloc failed %m\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + CHK_FAIL_START
> + FD_SET (FD_SETSIZE*2, pfdset);
> + CHK_FAIL_END
> + free (pfdset);
> #endif
> FD_CLR (FD_SETSIZE - 1, &s);
> #if __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL >= 1
> CHK_FAIL_START
> FD_CLR (FD_SETSIZE, &s);
> CHK_FAIL_END
> +
> + pfdset = (fd_set*)calloc(howmany(FD_SETSIZE+1, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
> + if (pfdset == NULL) {
> + printf("malloc failed %m\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + FD_CLR (FD_SETSIZE, pfdset);
> +
> + pfdset = (fd_set*)calloc(howmany(FD_SETSIZE*2, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
> + if (pfdset == NULL) {
> + printf("malloc failed %m\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + free (pfdset);
> +
> + pfdset = (fd_set*)calloc(howmany(FD_SETSIZE*2, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
> + if (pfdset == NULL) {
> + printf("malloc failed %m\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + CHK_FAIL_START
> + FD_CLR (FD_SETSIZE*2, pfdset);
> + CHK_FAIL_END
> + free (pfdset);
> #endif
> FD_ISSET (FD_SETSIZE - 1, &s);
> #if __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL >= 1
> CHK_FAIL_START
> FD_ISSET (FD_SETSIZE, &s);
> CHK_FAIL_END
> +
> + pfdset = (fd_set*)calloc(howmany(FD_SETSIZE+1, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
> + if (pfdset == NULL) {
> + printf("malloc failed %m\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + FD_ISSET (FD_SETSIZE, pfdset);
> + free (pfdset);
> +
> + pfdset = (fd_set*)calloc(howmany(FD_SETSIZE*2, NFDBITS), sizeof(fd_mask));
> + if (pfdset == NULL) {
> + printf("malloc failed %m\n");
> + return 1;
> + }
> + CHK_FAIL_START
> + FD_ISSET (FD_SETSIZE*2, pfdset);
> + CHK_FAIL_END
> + free (pfdset);
> #endif
>
> struct pollfd fds[1];
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-14 0:47 [PATCH v4 0/5] fix wrong program abort on __FD_ELT KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-14 0:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] __fdelt_chk: Removed range check KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 2:25 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-05-01 6:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 14:45 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-05-01 22:13 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-03 2:52 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-04-14 0:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] tst-chk1: add fd_set dynamic allocation test KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 2:44 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2013-05-01 6:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-14 0:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] __FD_ELT: Implement correct buffer overflow check KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 2:42 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-05-01 6:28 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 14:42 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-05-01 20:32 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-03 3:15 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-05-01 20:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-03 3:15 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-04-14 0:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] __FDS_BITS: Added cast to __fd_mask* to avoid warning KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 2:44 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-04-14 0:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] update libc.abilist KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] fix wrong program abort on __FD_ELT Carlos O'Donell
2013-05-01 5:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-05-01 14:38 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-05-01 22:21 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51808172.8060509@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).