Re: [PATCH] tile: improve detection for missing -mcmodel=large support

[Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>]

I pushed this to master.  "Ping" for David Miller to comment on 2.17 acceptability.  Thanks!

On 5/23/2013 10:05 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> (Adding David explicitly to Cc.)
>
> On 5/23/2013 6:17 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 05/23/2013 03:20 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>>> The existing test avoided passing -mcmodel=large if the compiler didn't
>>> support it.  However, we need to test not just the compiler support, but
>>> also the toolchain (as and ld) support, so make the test more complete.
>>> In addition, we have to avoid using the hwN_plt() assembly operators if
>>> that support is missing, so guard the uses with #ifdef NO_PLT_PCREL.
>>>
>>> This allows us to properly build glibc with the current community
>>> binutils, which doesn't yet have the PC-relative PLT operator support.
>>> The -mcmodel=large support is in gcc 4.8, but the toolchain support
>>> won't be present in the community until binutils 2.24.
>>> ---
>>> This change should also be applied on the 2.17 release branch for
>>> when we release a 2.17.1.
>> No, just backport it immediately after checkin to master. The 2.17
>> branch *is* 2.17.1 in development and when we get enough changes in
>> that branch we cut it and make a 2.17.1 release.
>>
>> You need release manager ACK though, which is David Miller. We normally
>> handle backports via bugzilla bugs with keyword glibc_2.17, but it
>> can be less formal if you just CC David and ask for ACK.
> David, is it OK if I backport this to the 2.17 branch after I commit?  Do you want a BZ# to track it?
>

-- 
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com