public inbox for libc-ports@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tile: improve detection for missing -mcmodel=large support
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 22:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519E9585.1090904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201305231925.r4NJPPJG013785@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com>

On 05/23/2013 03:20 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> The existing test avoided passing -mcmodel=large if the compiler didn't
> support it.  However, we need to test not just the compiler support, but
> also the toolchain (as and ld) support, so make the test more complete.
> In addition, we have to avoid using the hwN_plt() assembly operators if
> that support is missing, so guard the uses with #ifdef NO_PLT_PCREL.
> 
> This allows us to properly build glibc with the current community
> binutils, which doesn't yet have the PC-relative PLT operator support.
> The -mcmodel=large support is in gcc 4.8, but the toolchain support
> won't be present in the community until binutils 2.24.
> ---
> This change should also be applied on the 2.17 release branch for
> when we release a 2.17.1.

No, just backport it immediately after checkin to master. The 2.17
branch *is* 2.17.1 in development and when we get enough changes in
that branch we cut it and make a 2.17.1 release.

You need release manager ACK though, which is David Miller. We normally
handle backports via bugzilla bugs with keyword glibc_2.17, but it
can be less formal if you just CC David and ask for ACK.

> 2013-05-23  Chris Metcalf  <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
> 
> 	* sysdeps/tile/tilegx/Makefile ($(cflags-mcmodel-large)):
> 	Test for assembler and linker support for "-mcmodel=large -fpic"
> 	in addition to compiler support; provide -DNO_PLT_PCREL if not.
> 	* sysdeps/tile/start.S [NO_PLT_PCREL]: Guard for no PC-relative
> 	PLT operators in assembly.
> 	* sysdeps/tile/crti.S [NO_PLT_PCREL]: Likewise.

I didn't look at the rest of the patch but I assume it works
for you.

Cheers,
Carlos.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-23 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-23 19:25 Chris Metcalf
2013-05-23 22:17 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2013-05-24  2:05   ` Chris Metcalf
2013-05-28 18:37     ` Chris Metcalf
2013-06-06 20:10       ` Chris Metcalf
2013-06-06 21:36         ` David Miller
2013-06-09 15:22           ` Chris Metcalf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=519E9585.1090904@redhat.com \
    --to=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).