From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
libc-ports@sourceware.org, Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
Subject: Re: RFA: Port maintainers: Convert WORDSIZE[32|64]/ld to abi-variants
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 18:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4u18pk6.fsf@schwinge.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205261648450.16948@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 654 bytes --]
Hi!
On Sat, 26 May 2012 17:02:58 +0000, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > 1. For non-biarch architectures, there is nothing to do.
>
> This patch is removing the ld=ld-linux.so.2 entry for sh.*-.*-linux.*,
> which looks like a mistake; I don't see it added anywhere else.
Thanks for catching that. (I used the current version of the hjl/abi
branch, 0ab0291b84b45f2389a019af2c88bf5169d14f64.)
> We could probably do with each libc architecture maintainer confirming
> that their ABI tests still pass after the changes.
No issues found for SH.
Grüße,
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 13:37 H.J. Lu
2012-05-26 17:03 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-05-26 17:51 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-26 19:22 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-05-26 20:42 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-30 0:29 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-30 0:39 ` David Miller
2012-05-30 3:15 ` David Miller
2012-05-30 3:27 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-30 8:49 ` Andreas Krebbel
2012-05-30 13:00 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-31 15:17 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-05-31 15:32 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-01 14:06 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-06-01 14:21 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-01 15:07 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-06-01 15:27 ` H.J. Lu
2012-06-01 20:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-06-01 20:32 ` Roland McGrath
2012-05-30 18:58 ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2012-05-30 19:00 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4u18pk6.fsf@schwinge.name \
--to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).