From: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@linaro.org>,
libc-ports@sourceware.org, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: use lib64 as default lib and slib directory
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFqB+PztDHhwO84aG4oZunyc_sfc-Ux3sWe59jkBu1Yi1CW0nQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5141E8B5.7030503@redhat.com>
The patches applied to gcc and glibc to move aarch64 libraries from
/lib to /lib64 are inconsistent. We are now in a situation where gcc
expects the dynamic loader to be /lib while glibc installs it to
/lib64. I don't see a trivial change to Andreas' glibc patch. I
think these patches need to be reverted until a working solution is
found.
/Marcus
On 14 March 2013 15:11, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 04:46 AM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>> On 13 March 2013 16:29, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>>>> However, there was some recent discussion about this in gcc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jakub, What's the status?
>>>>
>>>> No progress there, see the
>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg00288.html
>>>> thread. I'd really like to get it resolved before we cut
>>>> GCC 4.8.0-rc1 this week.
>>>
>>> If it does change to /lib64, it would seem odd for the dynamic linker path
>>> (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in aarch64-linux.) to stay as
>>> /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 rather than also being in /lib64 (although s390
>>> also puts the 64-bit dynamic link in /lib).
>>
>> Changing the location of the linker breaks binaries. I'm not convinced
>> the disruption associated with that is justified.
>
> I agree with Marcus. If we don't need to move the dynamic linker then
> we shouldn't.
>
> Cheers,
> Carlos.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-18 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-13 11:33 Andreas Schwab
2013-03-13 13:42 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-03-13 13:47 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-03-13 14:57 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-03-14 8:40 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2013-03-13 16:29 ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-03-14 7:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-03-14 8:46 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2013-03-14 15:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
2013-03-18 11:25 ` Marcus Shawcroft [this message]
2013-03-18 11:41 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-03-15 14:53 ` Marcus Shawcroft
2013-03-15 16:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-03-15 18:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-03-18 11:53 ` [PATCH] Add support for rtld directory different from " Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFqB+PztDHhwO84aG4oZunyc_sfc-Ux3sWe59jkBu1Yi1CW0nQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
--cc=marcus.shawcroft@linaro.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).