From: Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
Cc: "libc-ports@sourceware.org" <libc-ports@sourceware.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix clone build for ARMv4
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 13:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANu=Dmggf9i4jdhj_Xp-uh8nZOK-hcX3c=qN9eKQ45ENDoHecQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANu=Dmhh3WtDJAPipaAtLT5k9LFLdWex=aPmecO_zEicB9UXTQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 23 January 2014 18:22, Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 23 January 2014 17:30, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 01/23/2014 06:49 AM, Will Newton wrote:
>>> ARMv4 does not have the blx instruction, so use the BLX macro which
>>> handles abstracting this for us.
>>>
>>> ports/ChangeLog.arm:
>>>
>>> 2014-01-23 Will Newton <will.newton@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> [BZ #16499]
>>> * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S: Use BLX macro instead
>>> of blx instruction directly.
>>> ---
>>> ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S | 8 +-------
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S
>>> index 44286a5..03fe9ab 100644
>>> --- a/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S
>>> +++ b/ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/clone.S
>>> @@ -88,14 +88,8 @@ PSEUDO_END (__clone)
>>> #endif
>>> @ pick the function arg and call address off the stack and execute
>>> ldr r0, [sp, #4]
>>> -#if defined(__ARM_ARCH_4T__) && defined(__THUMB_INTERWORK__)
>>> ldr ip, [sp], #8
>>> - mov lr, pc
>>> - bx ip
>>> -#else
>>> - ldr lr, [sp], #8
>>> - blx lr
>>> -#endif
>>> + BLX (ip)
>>
>> Looks good.
>>
>>>
>>> @ and we are done, passing the return value through r0
>>> b PLTJMP(HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET(_exit))
>>>
>>
>> Did you test this or ask the submitter to test it?
>>
>> If he says it works then OK to commit.
>
> I have tested this on armv7, I don't have an armv4 capable toolchain
> at the moment to test it for that arch.
I figured out the correct value of CFLAGS to get a build for armv4
(and armv4t) and the patch fixes the issue, so I have committed it.
--
Will Newton
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-24 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 11:49 Will Newton
2014-01-23 16:32 ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-01-23 17:31 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-01-23 18:22 ` Will Newton
2014-01-24 13:17 ` Will Newton [this message]
2014-01-25 10:10 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANu=Dmggf9i4jdhj_Xp-uh8nZOK-hcX3c=qN9eKQ45ENDoHecQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=will.newton@linaro.org \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).