* Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default
[not found] <20170912123435.6592-1-gabriel@inconstante.eti.br>
@ 2017-01-01 0:00 ` Gabriel F. T. Gomes
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel F. T. Gomes @ 2017-01-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libc-alpha, libc-stable
Thanks for all the reviews in this patch set.
I just pushed them.
I need to backport these patches to ibm/2.26/master. Usually, I backport
the patches to release/2.26/master first, then merge into ibm/2.26/master.
Is it fine to backport the patches to release/2.26/master, this time? Even
if they do not fix bugs in bugzilla? I believe it could benefit other
distros.
On 12 Sep 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
>Changes since v2 in each individual patch
>(Only patch 3 has changed)
>
>Gabriel F. T. Gomes (5):
> powerpc64le: Add -mfloat128 to tst-strtod-nan-locale testcase
> powerpc: Add redirection for finitef128, isinf128, and isnanf128
> ldbl-128ibm: Copy implementations from ldbl-128 instead of including
> them
> ldbl-128ibm: Automatic replacing of _Float128 and L()
> Remove conditional on LDBL_MANT_DIG from e_lgammal_r.c
>
> sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128/e_lgammal_r.c | 6 +-
> sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_expl.c | 4 +-
> sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_j0l.c | 867 +++++++++++++++++-
> sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_j1l.c | 888 +++++++++++++++++-
> sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/e_lgammal_r.c | 995 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/s_cbrtl.c | 104 ++-
> sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/t_expl.h | 970 ++++++++++++++++++++
> sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu/multiarch/s_finite.c | 7 +
> sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu/multiarch/s_isinf.c | 7 +
> sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64/fpu/multiarch/s_isnan.c | 7 +
> sysdeps/powerpc/powerpc64le/Makefile | 3 +
> 11 files changed, 3832 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128ibm/t_expl.h
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default
2017-01-01 0:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default Gabriel F. T. Gomes
@ 2017-01-01 0:00 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho @ 2017-01-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel F. T. Gomes, libc-alpha, libc-stable
"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" <gabriel@inconstante.eti.br> writes:
> Is it fine to backport the patches to release/2.26/master, this time? Even
> if they do not fix bugs in bugzilla? I believe it could benefit other
> distros.
AFAIR, having this patch on master is your approval to backport it to a
stable branch unless someone complains your patch is not stable enough.
I suggest to wait for objections for at least a week before merging it.
By the way, some distro maintainers have been backporting fixes for newer
GCC releases, so I agree with you this patchset is indeed important.
--
Tulio Magno
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default
2017-01-01 0:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default Gabriel F. T. Gomes
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
@ 2017-01-01 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Gabriel F. T. Gomes
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Weimer @ 2017-01-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel F. T. Gomes, libc-alpha, libc-stable
On 09/21/2017 11:31 PM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
> Thanks for all the reviews in this patch set.
> I just pushed them.
>
> I need to backport these patches to ibm/2.26/master. Usually, I backport
> the patches to release/2.26/master first, then merge into ibm/2.26/master.
>
> Is it fine to backport the patches to release/2.26/master, this time? Even
> if they do not fix bugs in bugzilla? I believe it could benefit other
> distros.
If I understand our situation correctly, we want these patches in Fedora
27, so backporting them to the stable release branch would be helpful
(so that we'll pick them up automatically).
Thanks,
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
@ 2017-01-01 0:00 ` Gabriel F. T. Gomes
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel F. T. Gomes @ 2017-01-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Weimer; +Cc: libc-alpha, libc-stable, siddhesh, tuliom
Thanks, Tulio, Florian...
My plan is to apply these patches to release/2.26/master today.
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:
>On 09/21/2017 11:31 PM, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote:
>> Thanks for all the reviews in this patch set.
>> I just pushed them.
>>
>> I need to backport these patches to ibm/2.26/master. Usually, I backport
>> the patches to release/2.26/master first, then merge into ibm/2.26/master.
>>
>> Is it fine to backport the patches to release/2.26/master, this time? Even
>> if they do not fix bugs in bugzilla? I believe it could benefit other
>> distros.
>
>If I understand our situation correctly, we want these patches in Fedora
>27, so backporting them to the stable release branch would be helpful
>(so that we'll pick them up automatically).
>
>Thanks,
>Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-09 14:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20170912123435.6592-1-gabriel@inconstante.eti.br>
2017-01-01 0:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Fixes for gcc enabling -mfloat128 by default Gabriel F. T. Gomes
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2017-01-01 0:00 ` Gabriel F. T. Gomes
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).