* [Backport] [PATCH] x86-64 memcmp: Use unsigned Jcc instructions on size [BZ #24155]
[not found] ` <20190204010338.GA4441@gmail.com>
@ 2019-01-01 0:00 ` H.J. Lu
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: H.J. Lu @ 2019-01-01 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Libc-stable Mailing List
I am backporting this to release branches.
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 5:03 PM
Subject: [PATCH] x86-64 memcmp: Use unsigned Jcc instructions on size
[BZ #24155]
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 09:33:35AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * H. J. Lu:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 7:32 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> * H. J. Lu:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 6:57 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> * H. J. Lu:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Since the size argument is unsigned. we should use unsigned Jcc
> >> >> > instructions, instead of signed to check size.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Tested on x86-64 and x32, with and without --disable-multi-arch.
> >> >>
> >> >> Does this impact x86-64 at all (technically), consider that an object
> >> >> size larger than SSIZE_MAX would be undefined anyway?
> >> >
> >> > I don't think we will hit it on x86-64.
> >> >
> >> >> It seems that on x32, it can give incorrect results if the sign bit on
> >> >> the 64-bit register is set. In this sense, it is similar to
> >> >> CVE-2019-6488 in impact, right? If we decide to treat this as a
> >> >
> >> > For x32, there is no invalid memory access. It just gives the wrong
> >> > result.
> >>
> >> Well, that could be problematic as well.
> >>
> >> Does the comparison stop early, only checking a prefix?
> >
> > On x32, memcmp always returns 0 when the most significant bit of RDX is set
> > since it treats size as 0, like memcmp (a, b, 0).
> >
> >> >> security vulnerability, we need a new CVE ID because the version range
> >> >> is different (bug 24155 was not fixed in the 2.29 release).
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Since the wrong result from memcmp may lead to security vulnerability, we
> >> > should apply for CVE.
> >>
> >> Sure, I'll take care of it.
>
> MITRE has assigned CVE-2019-7309. Please mention it in the appropriate
> places.
>
This is the patch I am going to check in tomorow.
Thanks.
H.J.
---
Since the size argument is unsigned. we should use unsigned Jcc
instructions, instead of signed, to check size.
Tested on x86-64 and x32, with and without --disable-multi-arch.
[BZ #24155]
CVE-2019-7309
* NEWS: Updated for CVE-2019-7309.
* sysdeps/x86_64/memcmp.S: Use RDX_LP for size. Clear the
upper 32 bits of RDX register for x32. Use unsigned Jcc
instructions, instead of signed.
* sysdeps/x86_64/x32/Makefile (tests): Add tst-size_t-memcmp-2.
* sysdeps/x86_64/x32/tst-size_t-memcmp-2.c: New test.
---
NEWS | 8 ++-
sysdeps/x86_64/memcmp.S | 20 +++---
sysdeps/x86_64/x32/Makefile | 3 +-
sysdeps/x86_64/x32/tst-size_t-memcmp-2.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 sysdeps/x86_64/x32/tst-size_t-memcmp-2.c
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 5cf568aed9..bc0b2bc3df 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -24,7 +24,13 @@ Changes to build and runtime requirements:
Security related changes:
- [Add security related changes here]
+ CVE-2019-7309: x86-64 memcmp used signed Jcc instructions to check
+ size. For x86-64, memcmp on an object size larger than SSIZE_MAX
+ has undefined behavior. On x32, the size_t argument may be passed
+ in the lower 32 bits of the 64-bit RDX register with non-zero upper
+ 32 bits. When it happened with the sign bit of RDX register set,
+ memcmp gave the wrong result since it treated the size argument as
+ zero. Reported by H.J. Lu.
The following bugs are resolved with this release:
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/memcmp.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/memcmp.S
index 1fc487caa5..1322bb3b92 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/memcmp.S
+++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/memcmp.S
@@ -21,14 +21,18 @@
.text
ENTRY (memcmp)
- test %rdx, %rdx
+#ifdef __ILP32__
+ /* Clear the upper 32 bits. */
+ movl %edx, %edx
+#endif
+ test %RDX_LP, %RDX_LP
jz L(finz)
cmpq $1, %rdx
- jle L(finr1b)
+ jbe L(finr1b)
subq %rdi, %rsi
movq %rdx, %r10
cmpq $32, %r10
- jge L(gt32)
+ jae L(gt32)
/* Handle small chunks and last block of less than 32 bytes. */
L(small):
testq $1, %r10
@@ -156,7 +160,7 @@ L(A32):
movq %r11, %r10
andq $-32, %r10
cmpq %r10, %rdi
- jge L(mt16)
+ jae L(mt16)
/* Pre-unroll to be ready for unrolled 64B loop. */
testq $32, %rdi
jz L(A64)
@@ -178,7 +182,7 @@ L(A64):
movq %r11, %r10
andq $-64, %r10
cmpq %r10, %rdi
- jge L(mt32)
+ jae L(mt32)
L(A64main):
movdqu (%rdi,%rsi), %xmm0
@@ -216,7 +220,7 @@ L(mt32):
movq %r11, %r10
andq $-32, %r10
cmpq %r10, %rdi
- jge L(mt16)
+ jae L(mt16)
L(A32main):
movdqu (%rdi,%rsi), %xmm0
@@ -254,7 +258,7 @@ L(ATR):
movq %r11, %r10
andq $-32, %r10
cmpq %r10, %rdi
- jge L(mt16)
+ jae L(mt16)
testq $16, %rdi
jz L(ATR32)
@@ -325,7 +329,7 @@ L(ATR64main):
movq %r11, %r10
andq $-32, %r10
cmpq %r10, %rdi
- jge L(mt16)
+ jae L(mt16)
L(ATR32res):
movdqa (%rdi,%rsi), %xmm0
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/x32/Makefile b/sysdeps/x86_64/x32/Makefile
index 1557724b0c..8748956563 100644
--- a/sysdeps/x86_64/x32/Makefile
+++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/x32/Makefile
@@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ endif
ifeq ($(subdir),string)
tests += tst-size_t-memchr tst-size_t-memcmp tst-size_t-memcpy \
tst-size_t-memrchr tst-size_t-memset tst-size_t-strncasecmp \
- tst-size_t-strncmp tst-size_t-strncpy tst-size_t-strnlen
+ tst-size_t-strncmp tst-size_t-strncpy tst-size_t-strnlen \
+ tst-size_t-memcmp-2
endif
ifeq ($(subdir),wcsmbs)
diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/x32/tst-size_t-memcmp-2.c
b/sysdeps/x86_64/x32/tst-size_t-memcmp-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d8ae1a0813
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/x32/tst-size_t-memcmp-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+/* Test memcmp with size_t in the lower 32 bits of 64-bit register.
+ Copyright (C) 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+ This file is part of the GNU C Library.
+
+ The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
+ version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+
+ The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
+ Lesser General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
+ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
+ <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#define TEST_MAIN
+#ifdef WIDE
+# define TEST_NAME "wmemcmp"
+#else
+# define TEST_NAME "memcmp"
+#endif
+
+#include "test-size_t.h"
+
+#ifdef WIDE
+# include <inttypes.h>
+# include <wchar.h>
+
+# define MEMCMP wmemcmp
+# define CHAR wchar_t
+#else
+# define MEMCMP memcmp
+# define CHAR char
+#endif
+
+IMPL (MEMCMP, 1)
+
+typedef int (*proto_t) (const CHAR *, const CHAR *, size_t);
+
+static int
+__attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))
+do_memcmp (parameter_t a, parameter_t b)
+{
+ return CALL (&b, a.p, b.p, a.len);
+}
+
+static int
+test_main (void)
+{
+ test_init ();
+
+ parameter_t dest = { { page_size / sizeof (CHAR) }, buf1 };
+ parameter_t src = { { 0 }, buf2 };
+
+ memcpy (buf1, buf2, page_size);
+
+ CHAR *p = (CHAR *) buf1;
+ p[page_size / sizeof (CHAR) - 1] = (CHAR) 1;
+
+ int ret = 0;
+ FOR_EACH_IMPL (impl, 0)
+ {
+ src.fn = impl->fn;
+ int res = do_memcmp (dest, src);
+ if (res >= 0)
+ {
+ error (0, 0, "Wrong result in function %s: %i >= 0",
+ impl->name, res);
+ ret = 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+#include <support/test-driver.c>
--
2.20.1
--
H.J.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread