From: Philip Ashmore <contact@philipashmore.com>
To: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: variadic closures in x86/x86_64
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:03:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A0799A.6070500@philipashmore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F023C084BCC16446BDA5B664305741E8091E8B@ALPMBAPA05.e2k.ad.ge.com>
On 05/12/13 00:54, Hogan, D. (GE Power & Water) wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
>> I may be talking through my hat but if there's a format argument then
>> couldn't you provide a function to parse it and then prepare other cifs
>> on an as-needed basis? The key would be the concatenation of all the
>> types in the format argument.
>
> Do you mean inside of a closure? I could access the assumed type
> information from the formatting string. The problem would be with
> ffi_call(). I can't send in a value for a variadic argument since
> I don't have a pointer to it.
>
No, I mean inside a regular function, as libffi doesn't (yet) support
variadic closures.
I don't know if it's possible to portably get pointers to variadic
arguments using va_arg, but if it is then you build up a list of
variadic arguments, synthesize a call using libffi by constructing a cif
with prep_cif_var if you don't already have an identical one, then call
the "real" function.
But then why not just call the "real" function?
I was (in my own convoluted way) trying to suggest a possible libffi
variadic closure implementation.
Any approach needs some hint as to the number and types of arguments to
unpack, like a format string.
Then it can do what it wants, like provide the arguments as a type/value
list, to the psuedo-variadic closure function to process.
The psuedo-variadic closure function could then have extra arguments - a
count and a type/value array pointer (or a pointer in libffi type-speak)
so you wouldn't even need a cif to call it.
Regards,
Philip Ashmore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-05 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-25 2:46 Hogan, D. (GE Power & Water)
2013-11-25 9:29 ` Andrew Haley
2013-11-25 9:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-25 10:10 ` Andrew Haley
2013-11-26 14:27 ` Alan Modra
2013-12-04 8:03 ` Hogan, D. (GE Power & Water)
2013-12-04 11:05 ` Philip Ashmore
[not found] ` <F023C084BCC16446BDA5B664305741E8091E8B@ALPMBAPA05.e2k.ad.ge.com>
2013-12-05 13:03 ` Philip Ashmore [this message]
2013-12-04 12:21 ` Andrew Haley
2013-12-04 18:28 ` Hogan, D. (GE Power & Water)
2013-12-04 18:51 ` Andrew Haley
2013-12-05 0:47 ` Hogan, D. (GE Power & Water)
2013-12-05 8:33 ` Andrew Haley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A0799A.6070500@philipashmore.com \
--to=contact@philipashmore.com \
--cc=libffi-discuss@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).