public inbox for libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kyrill  Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com>
To: Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd@compnerd.org>,
	 libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: armhf testsuite failures possibly due to 7ad0ae7f42
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59F04802.8050703@foss.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANXyDxtDxEHr_teZ6xxQVek8o9ONTG7HyMz1RpqmSVJwuM7sBw@mail.gmail.com>


On 25/10/17 01:20, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
> Hey, it was a silly bug caused by a level of indirection thing.  I 
> sent a PR (381) on github to address the issue.  It passes the tests 
> locally.
>

Thanks for looking into it!
Kyrill


> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM Saleem Abdulrasool 
> <compnerd@compnerd.org <mailto:compnerd@compnerd.org>> wrote:
>
>     On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 2:53 AM Kyrill Tkachov
>     <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com <mailto:kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>
>         Matthias' testing of libffi [1] (thanks!) shows some recent
>         failures on
>         armhf relating to closures with short types
>         (search for "FAIL:")
>
>         Considering that the results from May look okay I suspect the
>         culprit is
>         commit 7ad0ae7f42f3e208431ab66a9032dc9549f978d0 (arm: zext
>         return value
>         parameters)
>         from Oct 10.
>         Would it be possible to take a look and fix the failures?
>
>
>     Thanks for the notification.
>
>     Yeah, the tests probably need to be adjusted.  The tests look like
>     something which would be impacted by the zext.  It was previously
>     sending whatever was in the register previously.
>
>
>         Thanks,
>         Kyrill
>
>         (Please keep me on CC to any replies as I am not subscribed to
>         this list)
>
>         [1]
>         https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libffi&arch=armhf&ver=3.3~20171020-1&stamp=1508524302&raw=0
>         <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libffi&arch=armhf&ver=3.3%7E20171020-1&stamp=1508524302&raw=0>
>
>         [2]
>         https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libffi&arch=armhf&ver=3.3~20170512-1&stamp=1494644748&raw=0
>         <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libffi&arch=armhf&ver=3.3%7E20170512-1&stamp=1494644748&raw=0>
>
>     -- 
>     Saleem Abdulrasool
>     compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
>
> -- 
> Saleem Abdulrasool
> compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org

      reply	other threads:[~2017-10-25  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-23  9:53 Kyrill Tkachov
2017-10-24  0:35 ` Saleem Abdulrasool
2017-10-25  0:20   ` Saleem Abdulrasool
2017-10-25  8:15     ` Kyrill Tkachov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59F04802.8050703@foss.arm.com \
    --to=kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=compnerd@compnerd.org \
    --cc=libffi-discuss@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).