From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@wdc.com>, libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH libffi 3/4] Make `libffi-init' use $CC_FOR_TARGET
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:03:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7829390a7b7c0ce40a75f195189ea62a43252b45.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2004031400230.461@redsun52.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 23:56 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Update code in `libffi-init' to use $CC_FOR_TARGET in determining the
> value of $ld_library_path, as using a different compiler location from
> one actually used in testing may have odd consequences.
>
> As this obviously loses the setting of $gccdir provide a replacement way
> to determine the directory if feasible, however prefer the location of
> shared libgcc over static libgcc. This helps in configurations where
> shared libgcc is, unlike libgcc, a location that is not specific to the
> compiler version, a common scenario. It does not address the scenario
> however where there is a shared libgcc symlink installed pointing to the
> actual run-time library installed elsewhere; this would have to be dealt
> with in a board description file specific to the installation.
>
> Use `remote_exec host' rather than `exec' to invoke the compiler so as
> to support remote configurations and also avoid the latter procedure's
> path length limitation that prevents execution in some actual scenarios.
>
> As using `remote_exec host' precludes the use of our existing file name
> globbing to examine directory contents, reuse, with minor modifications
> needed to adjust to our structure, the piece I previously contributed to
> GCC with commit d42b84f427e4 ("testsuite: Fix run-time tracking down
> of `libgcc_s'").
> ---
> Hi,
>
> This has its limitation in that it still doesn't default to the same
> compiler as `target_compile' (`default_target_compile') from target.exp in
> DejaGNU does, but I believe it is a step in the right direction. That
> will only affect standalone (e.g. installed) testing iff $CC_FOR_TARGET
> hasn't been set.
>
> Also for C++ compilation our carefully crafted $ld_library_path is
> unfortunately overridden by `g++_link_flags' from libgloss.exp in DejaGNU
> called in `default_target_compile'. This actually does cause test
> failures in my `riscv64-linux-gnu' cross-compilation setup:
>
> FAIL: libffi.closures/unwindtest.cc -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O0 execution test
> FAIL: libffi.closures/unwindtest.cc -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O2 execution test
> FAIL: libffi.closures/unwindtest_ffi_call.cc -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O0 execution
> test
> FAIL: libffi.closures/unwindtest_ffi_call.cc -W -Wall -Wno-psabi -O2 execution
> test
>
> and I am currently not sure how to best address it, i.e. whether to change
> DejaGNU's `g++_link_flags' or to take advantage of a TCL's feature and
> provide our own copy of the procedure. Something to consider sometime.
>
> NB I chose not to correct obvious indentation issues with lines not
> touched by this change so as not to obfuscate the patch unnecessarily. A
> complementing formatting change follows.
>
> Maciej
> ---
> testsuite/lib/libffi.exp | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> -
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
OK. Note that all 4 patches in the series need ChangeLog entries.
jeff
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 22:55 [PATCH libffi 0/4] Robustify compiler and library path selection in the testsuite Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-04-03 22:55 ` [PATCH libffi 1/4] Use a template to pass $CC and $CXX to DejaGNU Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-04-06 17:58 ` Jeff Law
2020-04-03 22:55 ` [PATCH libffi 2/4] Use a documented way to pass $compiler_vendor " Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-04-06 18:00 ` Jeff Law
2020-04-03 22:56 ` [PATCH libffi 3/4] Make `libffi-init' use $CC_FOR_TARGET Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-04-06 18:03 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2020-04-03 22:56 ` [PATCH libffi 4/4] Correct indentation throughout `libffi-init' Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-04-06 18:01 ` Jeff Law
2020-04-14 13:59 ` [PING][PATCH libffi 0/4] Robustify compiler and library path selection in the testsuite Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-04-20 12:50 ` [PING^2][PATCH " Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7829390a7b7c0ce40a75f195189ea62a43252b45.camel@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libffi-discuss@sourceware.org \
--cc=macro@wdc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).