public inbox for libffi-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
To: Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
Cc: libffi-discuss@sourceware.org,
		"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
		Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, libffi, alpha]: Use FFI_ASSERT in ffi_closure_osf_inner
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 09:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4bq6NmEwVvoSYfpu7YwowkDdNuePmcyfZ2nCvohTUPN4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8738bmip4u.fsf@moxielogic.com>

On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com> wrote:
>
> [replying to an ancient post here..]
>
> Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Attached patch fixes libgo reflect test failure with libffi closures.
>> The gccgo compiler started to use FFI closures recently; the compiler
>> passes ffi_type_void for structures with zero members.
>
> Why not just pass an FFI_TYPE_STRUCT with zero members?
>
>> ffi_call form src/alpha/ffi.c allows FFI_TYPE_VOID arguments in
>> non-debug mode through the default: case, but ffi_closure_osf_inner
>> aborts with this type of argument.
>>
>> The patch changes the default case in ffi_closure_osf_inner from abort
>> to FFI_ASSERT, an this way synchronizes argument handling in both
>> cases.
>>
>> 2014-07-21  Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>
>>
>>     * src/alpha/ffi.c: Do not include stdlib.h.
>>     (ffi_closure_osf_inner) <default>: Use FFI_ASSERT instead of abort.
>>
>> Patch was tested with libffi testsuite on alphaev6-linux-gnu.
>> Additionally, the patch fixed reflect test from the libgo testsuite
>> and go.test/test/recover.go test from the gcc testsuite.
>
> Why not add an FFI_TYPE_VOID case so it doesn't ever abort if that's
> expected behaviour?  The default case is there to catch unexpected
> values.

The patch just equalizes handling of unknown arguments to ffi_call.
Also, the approach is the same as for x86_64 and i386 - these targets
doesn't abort for unknown arguments. There is no problem in adding
handling of FFI_TYPE_VOID to both functions, if this is the preferred
solution.

Uros.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-09-21  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-21 18:21 Uros Bizjak
2014-07-25  9:03 ` Uros Bizjak
2014-09-20 10:04 ` Anthony Green
2014-09-20 18:28   ` Jay
2014-09-20 22:04   ` Ian Lance Taylor
2014-09-21  9:17   ` Uros Bizjak [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFULd4bq6NmEwVvoSYfpu7YwowkDdNuePmcyfZ2nCvohTUPN4Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=green@moxielogic.com \
    --cc=iant@google.com \
    --cc=libffi-discuss@sourceware.org \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).