public inbox for libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix aliasing violation in std::shared_ptr
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 13:49:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220121134933.172441-1-jwakely@redhat.com> (raw)

Tested powerpc64le-linux. Does anybody see a problem with this change?


The non-atomic store that sets both reference counts to zero uses a
type-punned pointer, which has undefined behaviour. We could use memset
to write 8 bytes, but we don't actually need it to be a single store
anyway. No other thread can observe the values, that's why it's safe to
use non-atomic stores in the first place. So we can just set each count
to zero.

With -fstore-merging (which is enabled by default at -O2) GCC produces
the same code for this as for memset or the type punned store. Clang
does that store merging even at -O1.

libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:

	* include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h (_Sp_counted_base<>::_M_release):
	Set members to zero without type punning.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
index 5b8f84b65be..b2f955b41f7 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 	      // we are releasing the last strong reference. No other
 	      // threads can observe the effects of this _M_release()
 	      // call (e.g. calling use_count()) without a data race.
-	      *(long long*)(&_M_use_count) = 0;
+	      _M_weak_count = _M_use_count = 0;
 	      _GLIBCXX_SYNCHRONIZATION_HAPPENS_AFTER(&_M_use_count);
 	      _GLIBCXX_SYNCHRONIZATION_HAPPENS_AFTER(&_M_weak_count);
 	      _M_dispose();
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-01-21 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21 13:49 Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2022-01-23 22:51 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-01-24  4:46   ` Maged Michael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220121134933.172441-1-jwakely@redhat.com \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).