Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix aliasing violation in std::shared_ptr

[Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>]

I thought I'd CC'd Maged on this patch, but apparently not. I've
pushed it to trunk now.

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 13:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux. Does anybody see a problem with this change?
>
>
> The non-atomic store that sets both reference counts to zero uses a
> type-punned pointer, which has undefined behaviour. We could use memset
> to write 8 bytes, but we don't actually need it to be a single store
> anyway. No other thread can observe the values, that's why it's safe to
> use non-atomic stores in the first place. So we can just set each count
> to zero.
>
> With -fstore-merging (which is enabled by default at -O2) GCC produces
> the same code for this as for memset or the type punned store. Clang
> does that store merging even at -O1.
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
>         * include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h (_Sp_counted_base<>::_M_release):
>         Set members to zero without type punning.
> ---
>  libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
> index 5b8f84b65be..b2f955b41f7 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_base.h
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>               // we are releasing the last strong reference. No other
>               // threads can observe the effects of this _M_release()
>               // call (e.g. calling use_count()) without a data race.
> -             *(long long*)(&_M_use_count) = 0;
> +             _M_weak_count = _M_use_count = 0;
>               _GLIBCXX_SYNCHRONIZATION_HAPPENS_AFTER(&_M_use_count);
>               _GLIBCXX_SYNCHRONIZATION_HAPPENS_AFTER(&_M_weak_count);
>               _M_dispose();
> --
> 2.31.1
>