From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org,
RTEMS <devel@rtems.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: 60241.cc: tolerate slightly shorter aggregate sleep
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 10:55:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <695d0ddd-35a9-86de-7ce2-4ba64c47379e@embedded-brains.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9feeef3a-105b-ba95-3327-8a15320ec215@embedded-brains.de>
On 22/06/2022 08:22, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 22/06/2022 08:01, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>> On rtems under qemu, the frequently-interrupted nanosleep ends up
>> sleeping shorter than expected, by a margin of less than 0,3%.
>>
>> I figured failing the library test over a system (emulator?) bug is
>> undesirable, so I put in some tolerance for the drift.
>>
>> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to
>> aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
>>
>> PS: I see nothing wrong with the implementation of clock_nanosleep (used
>> by nanosleep) on rtems6 that could cause it to wake up too early. I
>> suspect some artifact of the emulation environment.
>>
>>
>> for libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
>>
>> * testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc: Tolerate a
>> slightly early wakeup.
>> ---
>> .../testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc
>> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc
>> index 12dbeba1cc492..f3a5af453c4ad 100644
>> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc
>> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/30_threads/this_thread/60421.cc
>> @@ -51,9 +51,10 @@ test02()
>> std::thread t([&result, &sleeping] {
>> auto start = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
>> auto time = std::chrono::seconds(3);
>> + auto tolerance = std::chrono::milliseconds(10);
>> sleeping = true;
>> std::this_thread::sleep_for(time);
>> - result = std::chrono::system_clock::now() >= (start + time);
>> + result = std::chrono::system_clock::now() + tolerance >= (start +
>> time);
>> sleeping = false;
>> });
>> while (!sleeping)
>
> This looks like a bug in RTEMS or the BSP for the test platform. I would
> first investigate this and then change the test which looks all right to
> me.
This is a problem in RTEMS. RTEMS uses the FreeBSD timecounters to
maintain CLOCK_REALTIME and provides two methods to get the time in a
coarse and fine resolution. The std::chrono::system_clock::now() uses
the fine resolution (higher overhead). The clock_nanosleep() uses the
coarse resolution which may give a time before now().
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
email: sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 16
fax: +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München
Registernummer: HRB 157899
Vertretungsberechtigte Geschäftsführer: Peter Rasmussen, Thomas Dörfler
Unsere Datenschutzerklärung finden Sie hier:
https://embedded-brains.de/datenschutzerklaerung/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 6:01 Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-22 6:22 ` Sebastian Huber
2022-06-22 8:55 ` Sebastian Huber [this message]
2022-06-23 0:15 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-23 0:19 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-23 6:44 ` Sebastian Huber
2022-06-23 7:27 ` Sebastian Huber
2022-06-23 11:33 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-23 11:37 ` Sebastian Huber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=695d0ddd-35a9-86de-7ce2-4ba64c47379e@embedded-brains.de \
--to=sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de \
--cc=devel@rtems.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=oliva@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).