From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
Cc: gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: testsuite: skip fs space tests if not available
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 12:31:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4k4dhWKvb-mCVfcyeoxBfh7A531bJ223Sx8BUokwX_KDw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <or1qvf63lp.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org>
On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 12:06, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2022, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > This could be done once in testsuite_fs.h as well.
>
> Done. Erhm, I posted the new revision of the patch for this thread in
> the last_write_time thread, so I'm posting the last_write_time one here.
Heh, yeah, I just noticed that.
> This one also depends on dg infrastructure added in the NO_SYMLINKS patch.
>
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to
> aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
OK, thanks.
>
> libstdc++: testsuite: skip fs last_write_time tests if dummy
>
> The last_write_time functions are defined in ways that are useful, or
> that fail immediately, depending on various macros. When they fail
> immediately, the filesystem last_write_time.cc tests fail noisily, but
> the fail is entirely expected.
>
> Define NO_LAST_WRITE_TIME in the last_write_time.cc tests, according
> to the macros that select implementations of last_write_time, and use
> it through the new dg-require-target-fs-lwt to skip tests that are
> expected to fail.
>
>
> for libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
>
> * testsuite/util/testsuite_fs.h (NO_LAST_WRITE_TIME): Define
> when appropriate.
> * testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp
> (check_v3_target_fs_last_write_time): New.
> * testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp (dg-require-target-fs-lwt):
> New.
> * testsuite/27_io/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc:
> Skip the test if the features are unavailable.
> * testsuite/experimental/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc:
> Likewise.
> ---
> .../27_io/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc | 1 +
> .../filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc | 1 +
> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp | 9 +++++++++
> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp | 8 ++++++++
> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_fs.h | 5 +++++
> 5 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc
> index 7d6468a512424..f6460fb83d70d 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>
> // { dg-do run { target c++17 } }
> // { dg-require-filesystem-ts "" }
> +// { dg-require-target-fs-lwt "" }
>
> // 15.25 Permissions [fs.op.last_write_time]
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc
> index 38fafc392ca9e..a0bf01ea935c5 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/experimental/filesystem/operations/last_write_time.cc
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> // { dg-options "-DUSE_FILESYSTEM_TS -lstdc++fs" }
> // { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
> // { dg-require-filesystem-ts "" }
> +// { dg-require-target-fs-lwt "" }
>
> // 15.25 Permissions [fs.op.last_write_time]
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp
> index 81bb8f448bd44..b61c4c0cb8fcd 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/dg-options.exp
> @@ -259,6 +259,15 @@ proc dg-require-target-fs-space { args } {
> return
> }
>
> +proc dg-require-target-fs-lwt { args } {
> + if { ![ check_v3_target_fs_last_write_time ] } {
> + upvar dg-do-what dg-do-what
> + set dg-do-what [list [lindex ${dg-do-what} 0] "N" "P"]
> + return
> + }
> + return
> +}
> +
> proc add_options_for_no_pch { flags } {
> # This forces any generated and possibly included PCH to be invalid.
> return "-D__GLIBCXX__=99999999"
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp
> index 22fdde8d66374..ca515c6f3548b 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/lib/libstdc++.exp
> @@ -1286,6 +1286,14 @@ proc check_v3_target_fs_space { } {
> return [v3_check_preprocessor_condition fs_space $cond $inc]
> }
>
> +# Return 1 if the libstdc++ filesystem implementation of
> +# last_write_time is not an always-failing dummy.
> +proc check_v3_target_fs_last_write_time { } {
> + set inc "#include <testsuite_fs.h>"
> + set cond "!defined NO_LAST_WRITE_TIME"
> + return [v3_check_preprocessor_condition fs_last_write_time $cond $inc]
> +}
> +
> # Return 1 if the "cxx11" ABI is in use using the current flags, 0 otherwise.
> # Any flags provided by RUNTESTFLAGS or a target board will be used here.
> # Flags added in the test by dg-options or dg-add-options will not be used.
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_fs.h b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_fs.h
> index 89042e5534139..037d9ffc0f429 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_fs.h
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_fs.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ namespace test_fs = std::experimental::filesystem;
> #define NO_SPACE
> #endif
>
> +#if !(_GLIBCXX_HAVE_SYS_STAT_H \
> + && (_GLIBCXX_USE_UTIMENSAT || _GLIBCXX_USE_UTIME))
> +#define NO_LAST_WRITE_TIME 1
> +#endif
> +
> namespace __gnu_test
> {
> #define PATH_CHK(p1, p2, fn) \
>
>
> --
> Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
> Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
> Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
> but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-23 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 6:27 Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-22 9:46 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-06-23 11:06 ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-06-23 11:31 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACb0b4k4dhWKvb-mCVfcyeoxBfh7A531bJ223Sx8BUokwX_KDw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=oliva@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).