public inbox for libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
To: whh8b@obs.cr
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Optimize operator+(string/char*, string/char*) equally
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 17:33:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACb0b4mH-OU8GkrWBjusaw3Q8vZR-pUVY69yXtMRMTc7_w5nuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822181509.1032874-2-whh8b@obs.cr>

On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 at 19:15, Will Hawkins wrote:
>
> Until now operator+(char*, string) and operator+(string, char*) had
> different performance characteristics. The former required a single
> memory allocation and the latter required two. This patch makes the
> performance equal.

If you don't have a GCC copyright assignment on file with the FSF then
please follow the procedure described at https://gcc.gnu.org/dco.html


> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>         * libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h (operator+(string, char*)):
>         Remove naive implementation.
>         * libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc (operator+(string, char*)):
>         Add single-allocation implementation.
> ---
>  libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h   |  7 +------
>  libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
> index b04fba95678..bc048fc0689 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.h
> @@ -3523,12 +3523,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_END_NAMESPACE_CXX11
>      _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
>      inline basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>

Please remove the 'inline' specifier here, since you're moving the
definition into the non-inline .tcc file.

There's a separate discussion to be had about whether these operator+
overloads *should* be inline. But for the purposes of this change, we
want these two operator+ overloads to be consistent, and so they
should both be non-inline.

>      operator+(const basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& __lhs,
> -             const _CharT* __rhs)
> -    {
> -      basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> __str(__lhs);
> -      __str.append(__rhs);
> -      return __str;
> -    }
> +             const _CharT* __rhs);
>
>    /**
>     *  @brief  Concatenate string and character.
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc
> index 4563c61429a..95ba8e503e9 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.tcc
> @@ -640,6 +640,27 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>        return __str;
>      }
>
> +  template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits, typename _Alloc>
> +    _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
> +    basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>
> +    operator+(const basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>& __lhs,
> +             const _CharT* __rhs)
> +    {
> +      __glibcxx_requires_string(__rhs);
> +      typedef basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc> __string_type;
> +      typedef typename __string_type::size_type          __size_type;
> +      typedef typename __gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<_Alloc>::template
> +       rebind<_CharT>::other _Char_alloc_type;
> +      typedef __gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<_Char_alloc_type> _Alloc_traits;
> +      const __size_type __len = _Traits::length(__rhs);
> +      __string_type __str(_Alloc_traits::_S_select_on_copy(
> +          __lhs.get_allocator()));
> +      __str.reserve(__len + __lhs.size());
> +      __str.append(__lhs);
> +      __str.append(__rhs, __len);
> +      return __str;
> +    }
> +
>    template<typename _CharT, typename _Traits, typename _Alloc>
>      _GLIBCXX_STRING_CONSTEXPR
>      typename basic_string<_CharT, _Traits, _Alloc>::size_type
> --
> 2.34.1
>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-23 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-22 18:15 whh8b
2022-08-22 18:15 ` whh8b
2022-08-23 16:33   ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2022-08-24  6:18     ` Will Hawkins
2022-08-24  9:49       ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-24  6:16   ` [PATCH v2] libstdc++: Optimize operator+(string/char*,string/char*) whh8b
2022-08-24  6:16     ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Optimize operator+(string/char*,string/char*) equally whh8b
2022-08-24  6:16       ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Optimize operator+(string/char*, string/char*) equally whh8b
2022-08-24 14:24       ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-24 22:39         ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-08-24 22:47           ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-24 23:02             ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-08-25  5:52               ` Will Hawkins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACb0b4mH-OU8GkrWBjusaw3Q8vZR-pUVY69yXtMRMTc7_w5nuQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=whh8b@obs.cr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).