From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Rodgers <rodgert@appliantology.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
Thomas Rodgers <trodgers@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/100889: Fix wrong param type in atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 00:18:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQuPHFGWB8Y86bRbWSOFFimQMxFNLMSO_SRce5NcgZ9WA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604230434.910594-1-rodgert@appliantology.com>
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, 00:05 Thomas Rodgers, <rodgert@appliantology.com> wrote:
> Fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100889
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> * include/bits/atomic_base.h (atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait):
> Change parameter type from _Tp to _Tp*.
> * testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_ref/deduction.cc: Add
> reproducer case from PR.
>
That file is testing CTAD, there should be a better place to add this.
---
> libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h | 2 +-
> libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_ref/deduction.cc | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
> b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
> index 029b8ad65a9..20cf1343c58 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
> @@ -1870,7 +1870,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
>
> #if __cpp_lib_atomic_wait
> _GLIBCXX_ALWAYS_INLINE void
> - wait(_Tp __old, memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) const
> noexcept
> + wait(_Tp* __old, memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) const
> noexcept
> { __atomic_impl::wait(_M_ptr, __old, __m); }
>
> // TODO add const volatile overload
> diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_ref/deduction.cc
> b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_ref/deduction.cc
> index 86395b0c2b0..ed46b430f7c 100644
> --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_ref/deduction.cc
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_ref/deduction.cc
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ test01()
> int* p = &i;
> std::atomic_ref a2(p);
> static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(a2), std::atomic_ref<int*>>);
> + a2.store(nullptr);
>
> struct X { } x;
> std::atomic_ref a3(x);
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-04 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-04 23:04 Thomas Rodgers
2021-06-04 23:18 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2021-06-05 0:44 ` [PATCH] [libstdc++] Fix Wrong param type in :atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait [PR100889] Thomas Rodgers
2021-06-07 22:02 ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix Wrong param type in :atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait [PR100889] [PR100889] Thomas Rodgers
2021-06-08 0:28 ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix Wrong param type in :atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait [PR100889] Thomas Rodgers
2021-06-08 15:44 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-06-08 23:03 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-06-09 14:30 ` Christophe Lyon
2021-06-09 14:52 ` Thomas Rodgers
2021-06-09 15:11 ` Jonathan Wakely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAH6eHdQuPHFGWB8Y86bRbWSOFFimQMxFNLMSO_SRce5NcgZ9WA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rodgert@appliantology.com \
--cc=trodgers@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).