From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: "Seija K." <doremylover123@gmail.com>,
"libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/98842: Fixed Constraints on operator<=>(optional, U)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 16:29:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdRGo6kSMk=zoouiQgQmGLdkai=dtaBcPAOrp2WVTDO51Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4=eCtxBujUUyVy-8ruahjYNCp0WDvZGGOYxYDJ9xhvJiA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 549 bytes --]
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 at 17:27, Seija K. via Libstdc++ <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
> wrote:
>
> > The original operator was underconstrained. _Up needs to fulfill
> > compare_three_way_result,
> > as mentioned in this bug report
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842
> >
>
> Thanks, I'll get the patch applied next week.
The patch causes testsuite failures.
I fixed it with the attached change instead, including a workaround
for an apparent C++20 defect.
Pushed to trunk so far.
[-- Attachment #2: patch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3227 bytes --]
commit adec14811714e22a6c1f7f0199adc05370f0d8b0
Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jun 7 13:02:15 2021
libstdc++: Constrain three-way comparison for std::optional [PR 98842]
The operator<=>(const optional<T>&, const U&) operator is supposed to be
constrained with three_way_comparable_with<U, T> so that it can only be
used when T and U are weakly-equality-comparable and also three-way
comparable.
Adding that constrain completely breaks std::optional comparisons,
because it causes constraint recursion. To avoid that, an additional
check that U is not a specialization of std::optional is needed. That
appears to be a defect in the standard and should be reported to LWG.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/98842
* include/std/optional (operator<=>(const optional<T>& const U&)):
Add missing constraint and add workaround for template
recursion.
* testsuite/20_util/optional/relops/three_way.cc: Check that
type without equality comparison cannot be compared when wrapped
in std::optional.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional
index 8b9e038e6e5..415f8c49ef4 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/optional
@@ -1234,7 +1234,14 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
{ return !__rhs || __lhs >= *__rhs; }
#ifdef __cpp_lib_three_way_comparison
+ template<typename _Tp>
+ inline constexpr bool __is_optional_v = false;
+ template<typename _Tp>
+ inline constexpr bool __is_optional_v<optional<_Tp>> = true;
+
template<typename _Tp, typename _Up>
+ requires (!__is_optional_v<_Up>)
+ && three_way_comparable_with<_Tp, _Up>
constexpr compare_three_way_result_t<_Tp, _Up>
operator<=>(const optional<_Tp>& __x, const _Up& __v)
{ return bool(__x) ? *__x <=> __v : strong_ordering::less; }
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/optional/relops/three_way.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/optional/relops/three_way.cc
index 953bef4a1ea..5fc5eec5abf 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/optional/relops/three_way.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/optional/relops/three_way.cc
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
// with this library; see the file COPYING3. If not see
// <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
-// { dg-options "-std=gnu++2a" }
-// { dg-do compile { target c++2a } }
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++20" }
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
#include <optional>
@@ -74,3 +74,21 @@ test02()
static_assert( nullopt <= O{} );
static_assert( nullopt <= O{1} );
}
+
+template<typename T>
+ concept has_spaceship = requires (const T& t) { t <=> t; };
+
+void
+test03()
+{
+ struct E
+ {
+ auto operator<=>(const E&) const { return std::strong_ordering::equal; }
+ };
+ static_assert( !std::three_way_comparable<E> ); // not equality comparable
+ using O = std::optional<E>;
+ static_assert( !std::three_way_comparable<O> );
+ static_assert( ! has_spaceship<O> ); // PR libstdc++/98842
+ struct U : O { };
+ static_assert( ! has_spaceship<U> );
+}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-03 16:25 Seija K.
2021-06-04 20:41 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-06-07 15:29 ` Jonathan Wakely [this message]
2021-06-13 21:59 ` Seija K.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAH6eHdRGo6kSMk=zoouiQgQmGLdkai=dtaBcPAOrp2WVTDO51Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jwakely.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=doremylover123@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
--cc=libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).